全球贷款损失会计准则:我们知道些什么?

Christian Domikowsky
{"title":"全球贷款损失会计准则:我们知道些什么?","authors":"Christian Domikowsky","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2521338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of empirical studies in recent years have used cross-country data to analyze topics related to the procyclicality of loan loss provisions. However, surprisingly little is known about countries' underlying local GAAP provisioning rules. In this study, we extend the knowledge on loan loss accounting across the globe in three different ways: First, we shed light on the distribution of different characteristics of more than 150 local GAAP loan loss accounting regimes across the globe using data from the World Bank's Bank Regulation and Supervision Survey. Second, we use these data to develop indices that reflect if a provisioning regime follows an incurred loss model or allows banks to take account of expected losses. Third, we group countries, e.g. by development status or continental region, and examine patterns in provisioning rules across these groups. Fourth, we conduct our own survey among eleven central banks which is intended to provide a more comprehensive understanding of provisioning regimes. Generally, we find considerable heterogeneity in the structure of provisioning rules across countries as well as groups of countries. Whilst most countries require banks to classify a loan as nonperforming if payments are in arrears, almost 35% of the countries in our sample allow the recognition of nonperforming loans based on a forward-looking estimate of the PD. This finding is by far more pronounced in highly developed countries. Our findings can have important implications for the analysis of loan loss provisions in cross-country settings.","PeriodicalId":314321,"journal":{"name":"SPGMI: SNL Financial Data (Topic)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loan Loss Accounting Rules across the Globe: What do we Know?\",\"authors\":\"Christian Domikowsky\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2521338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A number of empirical studies in recent years have used cross-country data to analyze topics related to the procyclicality of loan loss provisions. However, surprisingly little is known about countries' underlying local GAAP provisioning rules. In this study, we extend the knowledge on loan loss accounting across the globe in three different ways: First, we shed light on the distribution of different characteristics of more than 150 local GAAP loan loss accounting regimes across the globe using data from the World Bank's Bank Regulation and Supervision Survey. Second, we use these data to develop indices that reflect if a provisioning regime follows an incurred loss model or allows banks to take account of expected losses. Third, we group countries, e.g. by development status or continental region, and examine patterns in provisioning rules across these groups. Fourth, we conduct our own survey among eleven central banks which is intended to provide a more comprehensive understanding of provisioning regimes. Generally, we find considerable heterogeneity in the structure of provisioning rules across countries as well as groups of countries. Whilst most countries require banks to classify a loan as nonperforming if payments are in arrears, almost 35% of the countries in our sample allow the recognition of nonperforming loans based on a forward-looking estimate of the PD. This finding is by far more pronounced in highly developed countries. Our findings can have important implications for the analysis of loan loss provisions in cross-country settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPGMI: SNL Financial Data (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPGMI: SNL Financial Data (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2521338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPGMI: SNL Financial Data (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2521338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来的一些实证研究使用了跨国数据来分析与贷款损失准备的顺周期性有关的主题。然而,令人惊讶的是,人们对各国潜在的GAAP拨备规则知之甚少。在本研究中,我们通过三种不同的方式在全球范围内扩展了有关贷款损失会计的知识:首先,我们利用世界银行《银行监管与监督调查》的数据,阐明了全球150多个地方GAAP贷款损失会计制度的不同特征分布。其次,我们使用这些数据来开发指数,以反映准备金制度是否遵循已发生损失模型,或允许银行考虑预期损失。第三,我们对国家进行分组,例如,根据发展状态或大陆区域,并检查这些分组中的供应规则模式。第四,我们对11家中央银行进行了自己的调查,目的是对准备金制度提供更全面的了解。一般来说,我们发现不同国家和国家集团之间的供应规则结构存在相当大的异质性。虽然大多数国家要求银行将拖欠付款的贷款分类为不良贷款,但在我们的样本中,近35%的国家允许根据前瞻性的PD估计来确认不良贷款。这一发现在高度发达的国家更为明显。我们的研究结果对分析跨国环境下的贷款损失准备金具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Loan Loss Accounting Rules across the Globe: What do we Know?
A number of empirical studies in recent years have used cross-country data to analyze topics related to the procyclicality of loan loss provisions. However, surprisingly little is known about countries' underlying local GAAP provisioning rules. In this study, we extend the knowledge on loan loss accounting across the globe in three different ways: First, we shed light on the distribution of different characteristics of more than 150 local GAAP loan loss accounting regimes across the globe using data from the World Bank's Bank Regulation and Supervision Survey. Second, we use these data to develop indices that reflect if a provisioning regime follows an incurred loss model or allows banks to take account of expected losses. Third, we group countries, e.g. by development status or continental region, and examine patterns in provisioning rules across these groups. Fourth, we conduct our own survey among eleven central banks which is intended to provide a more comprehensive understanding of provisioning regimes. Generally, we find considerable heterogeneity in the structure of provisioning rules across countries as well as groups of countries. Whilst most countries require banks to classify a loan as nonperforming if payments are in arrears, almost 35% of the countries in our sample allow the recognition of nonperforming loans based on a forward-looking estimate of the PD. This finding is by far more pronounced in highly developed countries. Our findings can have important implications for the analysis of loan loss provisions in cross-country settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信