统计图中用于人眼注视预测的知觉和认知模型研究

M. Livingston, Laura E. Matzen, Andre Harrison, Alexander Lulushi, Mikaila Daniel, Megan Dass, Derek P. Brock, Jonathan W. Decker
{"title":"统计图中用于人眼注视预测的知觉和认知模型研究","authors":"M. Livingston, Laura E. Matzen, Andre Harrison, Alexander Lulushi, Mikaila Daniel, Megan Dass, Derek P. Brock, Jonathan W. Decker","doi":"10.1145/3385955.3407931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In theory, visual saliency in a graph should be used to draw attention to its most important component(s). Thus salience is commonly viewed both as a basis for predicting where graph readers are likely to look, and as a core design technique for emphasizing what a reader is intended to see among competing elements in a given chart or plot. We briefly review models, metrics, and applicable theories as they pertain to graphs. We then introduce new saliency models based on perceptual and cognitive theories that, to our knowledge, have not been previously applied to models for viewing statistical graphics. The resulting frameworks can be broadly classified as bottom-up perceptual models or top-down cognitive models. We report the results of evaluating these new theory-informed approaches on gaze data collected for statistical graphs and for more general information visualizations. Interestingly, the new models fare no better than previous ones. We review the experience, noting why we expected these hypotheses to be effective, and discuss how and why their performance did not match our aspirations. We suggest directions for future research that may help to clarify some of the issues raised.","PeriodicalId":434621,"journal":{"name":"ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2020","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of Perceptual and Cognitive Models Applied to Prediction of Eye Gaze within Statistical Graphs\",\"authors\":\"M. Livingston, Laura E. Matzen, Andre Harrison, Alexander Lulushi, Mikaila Daniel, Megan Dass, Derek P. Brock, Jonathan W. Decker\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3385955.3407931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In theory, visual saliency in a graph should be used to draw attention to its most important component(s). Thus salience is commonly viewed both as a basis for predicting where graph readers are likely to look, and as a core design technique for emphasizing what a reader is intended to see among competing elements in a given chart or plot. We briefly review models, metrics, and applicable theories as they pertain to graphs. We then introduce new saliency models based on perceptual and cognitive theories that, to our knowledge, have not been previously applied to models for viewing statistical graphics. The resulting frameworks can be broadly classified as bottom-up perceptual models or top-down cognitive models. We report the results of evaluating these new theory-informed approaches on gaze data collected for statistical graphs and for more general information visualizations. Interestingly, the new models fare no better than previous ones. We review the experience, noting why we expected these hypotheses to be effective, and discuss how and why their performance did not match our aspirations. We suggest directions for future research that may help to clarify some of the issues raised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2020\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3385955.3407931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3385955.3407931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从理论上讲,图表中的视觉显著性应该用来吸引人们对其最重要组成部分的注意。因此,突出性通常被视为预测图表读者可能会看哪里的基础,也是强调读者在给定图表或绘图中的竞争元素中想要看到什么的核心设计技术。我们简要回顾模型、指标和适用于图的理论。然后,我们介绍了基于感知和认知理论的新显著性模型,据我们所知,这些模型以前尚未应用于查看统计图形的模型。由此产生的框架可以大致分为自下而上的感知模型和自上而下的认知模型。我们报告了评估这些新的理论知情方法的结果,这些方法收集了用于统计图形和更一般信息可视化的凝视数据。有趣的是,新机型的表现并不比之前的好。我们回顾经验,指出为什么我们期望这些假设是有效的,并讨论他们的表现如何以及为什么不符合我们的期望。我们建议未来的研究方向,可能有助于澄清所提出的一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study of Perceptual and Cognitive Models Applied to Prediction of Eye Gaze within Statistical Graphs
In theory, visual saliency in a graph should be used to draw attention to its most important component(s). Thus salience is commonly viewed both as a basis for predicting where graph readers are likely to look, and as a core design technique for emphasizing what a reader is intended to see among competing elements in a given chart or plot. We briefly review models, metrics, and applicable theories as they pertain to graphs. We then introduce new saliency models based on perceptual and cognitive theories that, to our knowledge, have not been previously applied to models for viewing statistical graphics. The resulting frameworks can be broadly classified as bottom-up perceptual models or top-down cognitive models. We report the results of evaluating these new theory-informed approaches on gaze data collected for statistical graphs and for more general information visualizations. Interestingly, the new models fare no better than previous ones. We review the experience, noting why we expected these hypotheses to be effective, and discuss how and why their performance did not match our aspirations. We suggest directions for future research that may help to clarify some of the issues raised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信