机器学习在燃气轮机预见性维护中的应用

P. Pileggi, E. Lazovik, R. Snijders, L. Axelsson, Sietse Drost, Giulio Martinelli, Max de Grauw, Joris Graff
{"title":"机器学习在燃气轮机预见性维护中的应用","authors":"P. Pileggi, E. Lazovik, R. Snijders, L. Axelsson, Sietse Drost, Giulio Martinelli, Max de Grauw, Joris Graff","doi":"10.1115/gt2021-59249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n OEMs, service providers and end-users are moving from preventative to predictive maintenance to minimize the risk of unwanted power plant shut-downs and to maximize profitability. Digital Twin and Machine Learning (ML) are important techniques in this transformation as it complements and improves the traditional expert-based knowledge systems. There is a continued trend to use data-driven, so-called black-box, ML techniques as an improvement over traditional statistical approaches. However, these ML approaches suffer from low interpretability or explainability, making it hard to trust how or why a certain anomaly in the system is detected, limiting the trust in the prediction and making it much less likely to identify the real original cause of the problem. In this paper, we present our lesson learnt from operationalizing ML in a real-world use case that studied data from the 1.85 MWe OPRA OP16 all radial single-shaft gas turbine. We comment on the unforeseen obstacles we uncovered during our ML anomaly detection application and juxtapose them with the high potential value that our novel ML applications and explanation method can provide. ML may be enticing for the predictive maintenance of gas turbines but our lesson makes it clear that operationalizing ML goes beyond merely algorithm specifics. In line with the nature of the Digital Twin, it requires careful consideration of the specialized IT system supporting the algorithm, and the specific process it supports and in which it is deployed.","PeriodicalId":169840,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation; Cycle Innovations; Cycle Innovations: Energy Storage; Education; Electric Power","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Lesson on Operationalizing Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance of Gas Turbines\",\"authors\":\"P. Pileggi, E. Lazovik, R. Snijders, L. Axelsson, Sietse Drost, Giulio Martinelli, Max de Grauw, Joris Graff\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/gt2021-59249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n OEMs, service providers and end-users are moving from preventative to predictive maintenance to minimize the risk of unwanted power plant shut-downs and to maximize profitability. Digital Twin and Machine Learning (ML) are important techniques in this transformation as it complements and improves the traditional expert-based knowledge systems. There is a continued trend to use data-driven, so-called black-box, ML techniques as an improvement over traditional statistical approaches. However, these ML approaches suffer from low interpretability or explainability, making it hard to trust how or why a certain anomaly in the system is detected, limiting the trust in the prediction and making it much less likely to identify the real original cause of the problem. In this paper, we present our lesson learnt from operationalizing ML in a real-world use case that studied data from the 1.85 MWe OPRA OP16 all radial single-shaft gas turbine. We comment on the unforeseen obstacles we uncovered during our ML anomaly detection application and juxtapose them with the high potential value that our novel ML applications and explanation method can provide. ML may be enticing for the predictive maintenance of gas turbines but our lesson makes it clear that operationalizing ML goes beyond merely algorithm specifics. In line with the nature of the Digital Twin, it requires careful consideration of the specialized IT system supporting the algorithm, and the specific process it supports and in which it is deployed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 4: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation; Cycle Innovations; Cycle Innovations: Energy Storage; Education; Electric Power\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 4: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation; Cycle Innovations; Cycle Innovations: Energy Storage; Education; Electric Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2021-59249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation; Cycle Innovations; Cycle Innovations: Energy Storage; Education; Electric Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2021-59249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

原始设备制造商、服务提供商和最终用户正在从预防性维护转向预测性维护,以最大限度地降低不必要的电厂关闭风险,并最大化盈利能力。数字孪生和机器学习(ML)是这种转变中的重要技术,因为它补充和改进了传统的基于专家的知识系统。使用数据驱动的,所谓的黑箱,机器学习技术作为传统统计方法的改进是一种持续的趋势。然而,这些机器学习方法的可解释性或可解释性较低,使得很难信任如何或为什么检测到系统中的某个异常,限制了对预测的信任,并使其更不可能识别问题的真正原始原因。在本文中,我们介绍了在实际用例中应用ML的经验教训,该用例研究了1.85 MWe OPRA OP16全径向单轴燃气轮机的数据。我们评论了我们在机器学习异常检测应用中发现的不可预见的障碍,并将它们与我们的新机器学习应用和解释方法所能提供的高潜在价值并列。ML对于燃气轮机的预测性维护可能很有吸引力,但我们的经验清楚地表明,操作ML不仅仅是算法细节。根据数字孪生的性质,它需要仔细考虑支持该算法的专门it系统,以及它所支持的具体流程和部署流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Lesson on Operationalizing Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance of Gas Turbines
OEMs, service providers and end-users are moving from preventative to predictive maintenance to minimize the risk of unwanted power plant shut-downs and to maximize profitability. Digital Twin and Machine Learning (ML) are important techniques in this transformation as it complements and improves the traditional expert-based knowledge systems. There is a continued trend to use data-driven, so-called black-box, ML techniques as an improvement over traditional statistical approaches. However, these ML approaches suffer from low interpretability or explainability, making it hard to trust how or why a certain anomaly in the system is detected, limiting the trust in the prediction and making it much less likely to identify the real original cause of the problem. In this paper, we present our lesson learnt from operationalizing ML in a real-world use case that studied data from the 1.85 MWe OPRA OP16 all radial single-shaft gas turbine. We comment on the unforeseen obstacles we uncovered during our ML anomaly detection application and juxtapose them with the high potential value that our novel ML applications and explanation method can provide. ML may be enticing for the predictive maintenance of gas turbines but our lesson makes it clear that operationalizing ML goes beyond merely algorithm specifics. In line with the nature of the Digital Twin, it requires careful consideration of the specialized IT system supporting the algorithm, and the specific process it supports and in which it is deployed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信