图和皮拉穆图协议的安全性分析

J. Munilla, A. Peinado
{"title":"图和皮拉穆图协议的安全性分析","authors":"J. Munilla, A. Peinado","doi":"10.1109/NTMS.2008.ECP.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RFID (radio frequency identification) devices are usually vulnerable to attacks related to proximity verification: distance fraud attacks, relay attacks and terrorist attacks. These attacks require simpler technical resources than tampering or cryptanalysis and, they cannot be prevented by ordinary security protocols that operate in the high layers of the protocol stack. Distance bounding protocols, which are tightly integrated into the physical layer, are the main countermeasure against them. Hancke and Kuhn's protocol was the first distance bounding protocol for RFID. Tu and Piramuthu have recently proposed another protocol which outperform it. More precisely, the authors claim that their protocol reduces the false acceptance ratio and is resistant to terrorist attack. In this paper, however, we analyse this protocol and, discuss some aspects that could question its effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":432307,"journal":{"name":"2008 New Technologies, Mobility and Security","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Security Analysis of Tu and Piramuthu's Protocol\",\"authors\":\"J. Munilla, A. Peinado\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NTMS.2008.ECP.88\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RFID (radio frequency identification) devices are usually vulnerable to attacks related to proximity verification: distance fraud attacks, relay attacks and terrorist attacks. These attacks require simpler technical resources than tampering or cryptanalysis and, they cannot be prevented by ordinary security protocols that operate in the high layers of the protocol stack. Distance bounding protocols, which are tightly integrated into the physical layer, are the main countermeasure against them. Hancke and Kuhn's protocol was the first distance bounding protocol for RFID. Tu and Piramuthu have recently proposed another protocol which outperform it. More precisely, the authors claim that their protocol reduces the false acceptance ratio and is resistant to terrorist attack. In this paper, however, we analyse this protocol and, discuss some aspects that could question its effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 New Technologies, Mobility and Security\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 New Technologies, Mobility and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NTMS.2008.ECP.88\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 New Technologies, Mobility and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NTMS.2008.ECP.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

RFID(无线射频识别)设备通常容易受到与接近验证相关的攻击:距离欺诈攻击,中继攻击和恐怖袭击。这些攻击需要比篡改或密码分析更简单的技术资源,并且无法通过在协议栈的高层中操作的普通安全协议来阻止。与物理层紧密结合的距离边界协议是解决这些问题的主要手段。汉克和库恩的协议是RFID的第一个距离边界协议。Tu和Piramuthu最近提出了另一种优于它的协议。更准确地说,作者声称他们的协议降低了错误接受率,并抵抗恐怖袭击。然而,在本文中,我们分析了该协议,并讨论了可能质疑其有效性的一些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Security Analysis of Tu and Piramuthu's Protocol
RFID (radio frequency identification) devices are usually vulnerable to attacks related to proximity verification: distance fraud attacks, relay attacks and terrorist attacks. These attacks require simpler technical resources than tampering or cryptanalysis and, they cannot be prevented by ordinary security protocols that operate in the high layers of the protocol stack. Distance bounding protocols, which are tightly integrated into the physical layer, are the main countermeasure against them. Hancke and Kuhn's protocol was the first distance bounding protocol for RFID. Tu and Piramuthu have recently proposed another protocol which outperform it. More precisely, the authors claim that their protocol reduces the false acceptance ratio and is resistant to terrorist attack. In this paper, however, we analyse this protocol and, discuss some aspects that could question its effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信