印尼商法:分参与合同中银行债权人与银行债务人的法律建构

Krista Yitawati, A. Sulistiyono, Pujiono
{"title":"印尼商法:分参与合同中银行债权人与银行债务人的法律建构","authors":"Krista Yitawati, A. Sulistiyono, Pujiono","doi":"10.2991/icglow-19.2019.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The papers aims to analyze the legal construction between bank-creditor and bank-debitor in the sub-participation contract, which apparently has not been well covered by the two legal fields in the event of a dispute, whereas the funds lent in the banking business are very important to immediately withdraw and run to extend credit to other sectors, or to support the liquidity. In the case of bankruptcy requests for the banks, Bank Indonesia is legally entitled to submit to the Commercial Court even not as a part of contract. However, the institution never once took a request to the Commercial Court. Even before Indonesian banking supervision adopted a multiple supervision of banking system. Bankruptcy Act 2004 does not legally entitled the right to the crditor directly, nor does Banking Act 1998 regulate the mechanism of creditor’ claim in the event of a sub-participation contract, other than complaining to Bank Indonesia to request being his “advocate(?)” to litigate to the court.","PeriodicalId":246077,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)","volume":"278 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indonesian Business Law: Legal Construction Between Bank-Creditor and Bank-Debitor in the Sub-Participation Contract\",\"authors\":\"Krista Yitawati, A. Sulistiyono, Pujiono\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/icglow-19.2019.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The papers aims to analyze the legal construction between bank-creditor and bank-debitor in the sub-participation contract, which apparently has not been well covered by the two legal fields in the event of a dispute, whereas the funds lent in the banking business are very important to immediately withdraw and run to extend credit to other sectors, or to support the liquidity. In the case of bankruptcy requests for the banks, Bank Indonesia is legally entitled to submit to the Commercial Court even not as a part of contract. However, the institution never once took a request to the Commercial Court. Even before Indonesian banking supervision adopted a multiple supervision of banking system. Bankruptcy Act 2004 does not legally entitled the right to the crditor directly, nor does Banking Act 1998 regulate the mechanism of creditor’ claim in the event of a sub-participation contract, other than complaining to Bank Indonesia to request being his “advocate(?)” to litigate to the court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)\",\"volume\":\"278 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/icglow-19.2019.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icglow-19.2019.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析分参与合同中银行-债权人和银行-债务人之间的法律建构,这两个法律领域在发生纠纷时显然没有很好地涵盖,而银行业务中借出的资金对于向其他部门提供信贷或支持流动性非常重要。在银行破产请求的情况下,印尼银行在法律上有权向商事法庭提交,即使不是作为合同的一部分。然而,该机构从未向商事法庭提出过请求。甚至在印尼银行监管采取多重监管银行体系之前。2004年的《破产法》并没有在法律上直接赋予债权人权利,1998年的《银行法》也没有规定债权人在次级参与合同的情况下的索赔机制,只是向印尼银行投诉,要求成为他的“辩护人”,向法院提起诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indonesian Business Law: Legal Construction Between Bank-Creditor and Bank-Debitor in the Sub-Participation Contract
The papers aims to analyze the legal construction between bank-creditor and bank-debitor in the sub-participation contract, which apparently has not been well covered by the two legal fields in the event of a dispute, whereas the funds lent in the banking business are very important to immediately withdraw and run to extend credit to other sectors, or to support the liquidity. In the case of bankruptcy requests for the banks, Bank Indonesia is legally entitled to submit to the Commercial Court even not as a part of contract. However, the institution never once took a request to the Commercial Court. Even before Indonesian banking supervision adopted a multiple supervision of banking system. Bankruptcy Act 2004 does not legally entitled the right to the crditor directly, nor does Banking Act 1998 regulate the mechanism of creditor’ claim in the event of a sub-participation contract, other than complaining to Bank Indonesia to request being his “advocate(?)” to litigate to the court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信