新俄亥俄爱迪生公司能源管理系统的成本论证

[Proceedings] Conference Papers 1991 Power Industry Computer Application Conference Pub Date : 1991-05-07 DOI:10.1109/PICA.1991.160627

A. Jamshidi, E. Stein, B. Hoveida, J. Robinson

{"title":"新俄亥俄爱迪生公司能源管理系统的成本论证","authors":"A. Jamshidi, E. Stein, B. Hoveida, J. Robinson","doi":"10.1109/PICA.1991.160627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A systematic method for analyzing alternative strategies that the Ohio Edison (OE) Company used during the feasibility study of its energy management system (EMS) is discussed. A key element in the requirements study of an EMS is determining the value of not only the present system, but also of several feasible alternatives in terms of present worth dollars. The term value represents the difference between a system's benefits (or the loss of those benefits) and its cost. When the values of various alternatives are compared over time with that of the existing system, the most cost-effective point for system replacement can be accurately defined along with the best alternative.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":287152,"journal":{"name":"[Proceedings] Conference Papers 1991 Power Industry Computer Application Conference","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost justification of the new Ohio Edison Company's energy management system\",\"authors\":\"A. Jamshidi, E. Stein, B. Hoveida, J. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PICA.1991.160627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A systematic method for analyzing alternative strategies that the Ohio Edison (OE) Company used during the feasibility study of its energy management system (EMS) is discussed. A key element in the requirements study of an EMS is determining the value of not only the present system, but also of several feasible alternatives in terms of present worth dollars. The term value represents the difference between a system's benefits (or the loss of those benefits) and its cost. When the values of various alternatives are compared over time with that of the existing system, the most cost-effective point for system replacement can be accurately defined along with the best alternative.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":287152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[Proceedings] Conference Papers 1991 Power Industry Computer Application Conference\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[Proceedings] Conference Papers 1991 Power Industry Computer Application Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICA.1991.160627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Proceedings] Conference Papers 1991 Power Industry Computer Application Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICA.1991.160627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

本文系统地分析了俄亥俄爱迪生公司在其能源管理系统可行性研究中所采用的备选策略。环境管理系统需求研究的一个关键因素是，不仅要确定当前系统的价值，还要确定若干可行的替代系统的价值，以现值美元计算。术语“价值”表示系统的收益(或这些收益的损失)与其成本之间的差异。随着时间的推移，将各种替代方案的价值与现有系统的价值进行比较，可以准确地确定系统更换的最具成本效益点以及最佳替代方案

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Cost justification of the new Ohio Edison Company's energy management system

A systematic method for analyzing alternative strategies that the Ohio Edison (OE) Company used during the feasibility study of its energy management system (EMS) is discussed. A key element in the requirements study of an EMS is determining the value of not only the present system, but also of several feasible alternatives in terms of present worth dollars. The term value represents the difference between a system's benefits (or the loss of those benefits) and its cost. When the values of various alternatives are compared over time with that of the existing system, the most cost-effective point for system replacement can be accurately defined along with the best alternative.<>

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

[Proceedings] Conference Papers 1991 Power Industry Computer Application Conference

自引率

0.00%

发文量