集体多目标规划

A. Mouaddib, M. Juin
{"title":"集体多目标规划","authors":"A. Mouaddib, M. Juin","doi":"10.1109/DIS.2006.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-objective multi-agent planning addresses the problem of resolving conflicts between individual agent interests and the group interests. In this paper, we address this problem using a vector-valued decentralized Markov decision process (2V-DEC-MDP). The formal framework of a vector-valued MDP considered uses the value function which returns a vector representing the individual and the group interests. Indeed, local decisions of each agent are guided by the local reward of the agent, the opportunity gain to the group and the opportunity cost of its nuisance. An optimal policy in such contexts is not clear but in this approach we develop a regret-based technique to find a good tradeoff between the group and individual interests. To do that, the approach we present uses Egalitarian social welfare orderings that allow an agent to consider during its local optimization the satisfaction of all criteria and reducing their differences. The obtained result is an equilibrium of individual and group satisfactions where the local policies can lead to more global satisfying behaviors in some settings. This result is illustrated in an example and compared to alternate local policies","PeriodicalId":318812,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems: Collective Intelligence and Its Applications (DIS'06)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collective Multi-Objective Planning\",\"authors\":\"A. Mouaddib, M. Juin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DIS.2006.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multi-objective multi-agent planning addresses the problem of resolving conflicts between individual agent interests and the group interests. In this paper, we address this problem using a vector-valued decentralized Markov decision process (2V-DEC-MDP). The formal framework of a vector-valued MDP considered uses the value function which returns a vector representing the individual and the group interests. Indeed, local decisions of each agent are guided by the local reward of the agent, the opportunity gain to the group and the opportunity cost of its nuisance. An optimal policy in such contexts is not clear but in this approach we develop a regret-based technique to find a good tradeoff between the group and individual interests. To do that, the approach we present uses Egalitarian social welfare orderings that allow an agent to consider during its local optimization the satisfaction of all criteria and reducing their differences. The obtained result is an equilibrium of individual and group satisfactions where the local policies can lead to more global satisfying behaviors in some settings. This result is illustrated in an example and compared to alternate local policies\",\"PeriodicalId\":318812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems: Collective Intelligence and Its Applications (DIS'06)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems: Collective Intelligence and Its Applications (DIS'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DIS.2006.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems: Collective Intelligence and Its Applications (DIS'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DIS.2006.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

多目标多主体规划解决了个体主体利益与群体利益之间的冲突问题。在本文中,我们使用向量值分散马尔可夫决策过程(2V-DEC-MDP)来解决这个问题。所考虑的向量值MDP的正式框架使用值函数,该函数返回代表个人和群体利益的向量。实际上,每个个体的局部决策是由个体的局部奖励、群体的机会收益和群体滋扰的机会成本所指导的。在这种情况下,最佳策略尚不清楚,但在这种方法中,我们开发了一种基于遗憾的技术,以找到群体和个人利益之间的良好权衡。为了做到这一点,我们提出的方法使用平等主义的社会福利排序,允许代理在其局部优化过程中考虑所有标准的满足并减少它们的差异。获得的结果是个人和群体满意度的平衡,其中局部政策可以在某些设置中导致更多的全局满意行为。在一个示例中说明了该结果,并将其与其他本地策略进行了比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collective Multi-Objective Planning
Multi-objective multi-agent planning addresses the problem of resolving conflicts between individual agent interests and the group interests. In this paper, we address this problem using a vector-valued decentralized Markov decision process (2V-DEC-MDP). The formal framework of a vector-valued MDP considered uses the value function which returns a vector representing the individual and the group interests. Indeed, local decisions of each agent are guided by the local reward of the agent, the opportunity gain to the group and the opportunity cost of its nuisance. An optimal policy in such contexts is not clear but in this approach we develop a regret-based technique to find a good tradeoff between the group and individual interests. To do that, the approach we present uses Egalitarian social welfare orderings that allow an agent to consider during its local optimization the satisfaction of all criteria and reducing their differences. The obtained result is an equilibrium of individual and group satisfactions where the local policies can lead to more global satisfying behaviors in some settings. This result is illustrated in an example and compared to alternate local policies
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信