枪支管制:你脑子里在想什么

A. D. da Rocha, F. Rocha, E. Massad
{"title":"枪支管制:你脑子里在想什么","authors":"A. D. da Rocha, F. Rocha, E. Massad","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2330957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arguments for and against gun control are polarized at two opposite ends of a broad spectrum: personal liberties and social benefits. Brazil has introduced a referendum regarding the prohibition of firearm commerce and propaganda arguments, similar to the present ongoing discussion in the U.S. It has invoked socially and personally driven issues in the promotion of voting in favor of and against firearm control, respectively. Here, we used electroencephalography (EEG) technology to study the brain activity associated with a voter’s perception one week prior to Election Day, of the truthfulness of these arguments and their influence on voting decisions. The present results clearly showed that this decision was not influenced by arguments that were introduced by propaganda, which were typically driven by specific social and self-interest motives. In addition, different neural circuits were identified in the analysis of arguments for and against gun control.","PeriodicalId":358003,"journal":{"name":"BioRN: Neurophysiology (Topic)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gun Control: What Goes on in Your Brain\",\"authors\":\"A. D. da Rocha, F. Rocha, E. Massad\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2330957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arguments for and against gun control are polarized at two opposite ends of a broad spectrum: personal liberties and social benefits. Brazil has introduced a referendum regarding the prohibition of firearm commerce and propaganda arguments, similar to the present ongoing discussion in the U.S. It has invoked socially and personally driven issues in the promotion of voting in favor of and against firearm control, respectively. Here, we used electroencephalography (EEG) technology to study the brain activity associated with a voter’s perception one week prior to Election Day, of the truthfulness of these arguments and their influence on voting decisions. The present results clearly showed that this decision was not influenced by arguments that were introduced by propaganda, which were typically driven by specific social and self-interest motives. In addition, different neural circuits were identified in the analysis of arguments for and against gun control.\",\"PeriodicalId\":358003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioRN: Neurophysiology (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioRN: Neurophysiology (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2330957\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioRN: Neurophysiology (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2330957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

支持和反对枪支管制的争论在广泛的范围内两极分化:个人自由和社会利益。巴西已经引入了关于禁止枪支交易和宣传论据的全民公决,类似于美国目前正在进行的讨论。它分别援引社会和个人驱动的问题来促进投票赞成和反对枪支管制。在这里,我们使用脑电图(EEG)技术来研究与选举日前一周选民对这些论点的真实性及其对投票决定的影响的感知相关的大脑活动。目前的结果清楚地表明,这一决定没有受到宣传所引入的论点的影响,这些论点通常是由特定的社会和自身利益动机驱动的。此外,在分析支持和反对枪支管制的论据时,发现了不同的神经回路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gun Control: What Goes on in Your Brain
Arguments for and against gun control are polarized at two opposite ends of a broad spectrum: personal liberties and social benefits. Brazil has introduced a referendum regarding the prohibition of firearm commerce and propaganda arguments, similar to the present ongoing discussion in the U.S. It has invoked socially and personally driven issues in the promotion of voting in favor of and against firearm control, respectively. Here, we used electroencephalography (EEG) technology to study the brain activity associated with a voter’s perception one week prior to Election Day, of the truthfulness of these arguments and their influence on voting decisions. The present results clearly showed that this decision was not influenced by arguments that were introduced by propaganda, which were typically driven by specific social and self-interest motives. In addition, different neural circuits were identified in the analysis of arguments for and against gun control.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信