规模和比例的施工后分析:以美国伍德伯里大厦为例,反映令人信服的设计原则

Worasak Luangsuwan
{"title":"规模和比例的施工后分析:以美国伍德伯里大厦为例,反映令人信服的设计原则","authors":"Worasak Luangsuwan","doi":"10.56261/jars.v21.257797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nCritically assessing your own design work after it has been constructed for several years is an exciting question of self-peer review that has to set aside the initial design amplitude while letting the theories perform in order to discover some unexpected results with respect to the original design. This paradoxical mechanism between practicing and teaching when career switching from a professional practitioner to a university instructor can harmoniously integrate theory and praxis to illuminate future paths and amplify innovation. Here, I use the Woodbury Towers in the Woodbury Irvine Community as a case study to explore planning design practice in context of the Southern California landscape as the subject of the self-peer review process. Creating community is building a place for people to live and share their experience. Community basically refers to sets of people who may identify themselves with a place in terms of notions of commonality, shared values or solidarity in particular contexts. Landscape architecture can contribute to a sense of community by contributing theories, experiences and design vision in the development process. In this paper, the synchronization of design scale and proportion considered essential, has been explored to reflect theoretical functions and aesthetic characteristics of good design since the Classical Era. The principle of The Golden Section ratio simulated with a digital superimposition technique is the main tool for this research method which led to discovery of the subconscious ideas in the post-construction phase.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":428713,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Construction Analysis of Scale and Proportion: A Case Study of the Woodbury Towers, USA, in Reflecting Cogent Design Principles\",\"authors\":\"Worasak Luangsuwan\",\"doi\":\"10.56261/jars.v21.257797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\n\\nCritically assessing your own design work after it has been constructed for several years is an exciting question of self-peer review that has to set aside the initial design amplitude while letting the theories perform in order to discover some unexpected results with respect to the original design. This paradoxical mechanism between practicing and teaching when career switching from a professional practitioner to a university instructor can harmoniously integrate theory and praxis to illuminate future paths and amplify innovation. Here, I use the Woodbury Towers in the Woodbury Irvine Community as a case study to explore planning design practice in context of the Southern California landscape as the subject of the self-peer review process. Creating community is building a place for people to live and share their experience. Community basically refers to sets of people who may identify themselves with a place in terms of notions of commonality, shared values or solidarity in particular contexts. Landscape architecture can contribute to a sense of community by contributing theories, experiences and design vision in the development process. In this paper, the synchronization of design scale and proportion considered essential, has been explored to reflect theoretical functions and aesthetic characteristics of good design since the Classical Era. The principle of The Golden Section ratio simulated with a digital superimposition technique is the main tool for this research method which led to discovery of the subconscious ideas in the post-construction phase.\\n\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":428713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56261/jars.v21.257797\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56261/jars.v21.257797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在自己的设计作品构建数年之后,对其进行批判性评估是一个令人兴奋的自我同行评审问题,它必须抛开最初的设计幅度,而让理论发挥作用,以便发现一些与原始设计相关的意想不到的结果。这种从专业实践者到大学讲师的职业转换过程中实践与教学的矛盾机制,可以将理论与实践和谐地结合起来,照亮未来的道路,放大创新。在这里,我以伍德伯里欧文社区的伍德伯里塔作为案例研究,探索南加州景观背景下的规划设计实践,作为自我同行评审过程的主题。创建社区就是为人们建造一个生活和分享经验的地方。社区基本上指的是一群人,他们在特定背景下,可能会在共性、共同价值观或团结的概念方面认同自己的地方。景观设计可以通过在发展过程中提供理论、经验和设计愿景来促进社区意识。本文从古典时代开始,探讨了设计尺度与比例的同步性,以体现好设计的理论功能和美学特征。用数字叠加技术模拟黄金分割比例的原理是该研究方法的主要工具,从而发现了后期施工阶段的潜意识想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-Construction Analysis of Scale and Proportion: A Case Study of the Woodbury Towers, USA, in Reflecting Cogent Design Principles
Critically assessing your own design work after it has been constructed for several years is an exciting question of self-peer review that has to set aside the initial design amplitude while letting the theories perform in order to discover some unexpected results with respect to the original design. This paradoxical mechanism between practicing and teaching when career switching from a professional practitioner to a university instructor can harmoniously integrate theory and praxis to illuminate future paths and amplify innovation. Here, I use the Woodbury Towers in the Woodbury Irvine Community as a case study to explore planning design practice in context of the Southern California landscape as the subject of the self-peer review process. Creating community is building a place for people to live and share their experience. Community basically refers to sets of people who may identify themselves with a place in terms of notions of commonality, shared values or solidarity in particular contexts. Landscape architecture can contribute to a sense of community by contributing theories, experiences and design vision in the development process. In this paper, the synchronization of design scale and proportion considered essential, has been explored to reflect theoretical functions and aesthetic characteristics of good design since the Classical Era. The principle of The Golden Section ratio simulated with a digital superimposition technique is the main tool for this research method which led to discovery of the subconscious ideas in the post-construction phase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信