软件故障归责程序的比较

J. V. Hulse, T. Khoshgoftaar, Chris Seiffert
{"title":"软件故障归责程序的比较","authors":"J. V. Hulse, T. Khoshgoftaar, Chris Seiffert","doi":"10.1109/ICMLA.2006.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work presents a detailed comparison of three imputation techniques, Bayesian multiple imputation, regression imputation and k nearest neighbor imputation, at various missingness levels. Starting with a complete real-world software measurement dataset called CCCS, missing values were injected into the dependent variable at four levels according to three different missingness mechanisms. The three imputation techniques are evaluated by comparing the imputed and actual values. Our analysis includes a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model, which demonstrates that Bayesian multiple imputation obtains the best performance, followed closely by regression","PeriodicalId":297071,"journal":{"name":"2006 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA'06)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Software Fault Imputation Procedures\",\"authors\":\"J. V. Hulse, T. Khoshgoftaar, Chris Seiffert\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMLA.2006.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work presents a detailed comparison of three imputation techniques, Bayesian multiple imputation, regression imputation and k nearest neighbor imputation, at various missingness levels. Starting with a complete real-world software measurement dataset called CCCS, missing values were injected into the dependent variable at four levels according to three different missingness mechanisms. The three imputation techniques are evaluated by comparing the imputed and actual values. Our analysis includes a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model, which demonstrates that Bayesian multiple imputation obtains the best performance, followed closely by regression\",\"PeriodicalId\":297071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA'06)\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2006.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2006.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

这项工作提出了三种imputation技术的详细比较,贝叶斯多元imputation,回归imputation和k最近邻imputation,在不同的缺失水平。从一个名为CCCS的完整的现实世界软件测量数据集开始,根据三种不同的缺失机制,将缺失值注入四个层次的因变量中。通过比较估算值和实际值,对三种估算方法进行了评价。我们的分析包括三向方差分析(ANOVA)模型,结果表明贝叶斯多元插值获得了最好的效果,其次是回归
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Software Fault Imputation Procedures
This work presents a detailed comparison of three imputation techniques, Bayesian multiple imputation, regression imputation and k nearest neighbor imputation, at various missingness levels. Starting with a complete real-world software measurement dataset called CCCS, missing values were injected into the dependent variable at four levels according to three different missingness mechanisms. The three imputation techniques are evaluated by comparing the imputed and actual values. Our analysis includes a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model, which demonstrates that Bayesian multiple imputation obtains the best performance, followed closely by regression
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信