{"title":"可靠性方法与REMM过程的比较","authors":"J. Marshall, D. Lumbard, J. Davies, G. Tanner","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes conventional methods of reliability prediction and their uses. It also describes the REMM process and the REMM statistical model. Examples of using the REMM process are shown from 4 aerospace companies and a comparison made between the REMM process and conventional reliability approaches. The paper concludes by listing the advantages and disadvantages of using the REMM process as compared to conventional reliability methods.","PeriodicalId":270494,"journal":{"name":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of reliability methods and the REMM process\",\"authors\":\"J. Marshall, D. Lumbard, J. Davies, G. Tanner\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes conventional methods of reliability prediction and their uses. It also describes the REMM process and the REMM statistical model. Examples of using the REMM process are shown from 4 aerospace companies and a comparison made between the REMM process and conventional reliability approaches. The paper concludes by listing the advantages and disadvantages of using the REMM process as compared to conventional reliability methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2004.1285477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparison of reliability methods and the REMM process
This paper describes conventional methods of reliability prediction and their uses. It also describes the REMM process and the REMM statistical model. Examples of using the REMM process are shown from 4 aerospace companies and a comparison made between the REMM process and conventional reliability approaches. The paper concludes by listing the advantages and disadvantages of using the REMM process as compared to conventional reliability methods.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
