基于linux的开源VPN解决方案的实验评估

Shashank Khanvilkar, A. Khokhar
{"title":"基于linux的开源VPN解决方案的实验评估","authors":"Shashank Khanvilkar, A. Khokhar","doi":"10.1109/ICCCN.2004.1401619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtual private networks (VPNs) provide a low-cost alternative to leased lines and as such, are becoming increasingly popular among commercial and defense organizations for providing vital inter-office connectivity. Several commercial and open-source VPN products are now available that mainly differ in their capabilities to provide safe and secure services. In this paper, we study fifteen popular open-source Linux-based VPN solutions (OSLVs) and compare them with respect to network performances (bandwidth, delay and latency/jitter), supported features & functionalities (algorithm plug-ins and routing) and operational concerns (security and scalability). Experiments suggest that there is no single OSLV that excels in all the considered aspects and a combination of different solutions and/or tradeoff among desired characteristics may be required to deliver an optimal performance. Also network performance results suggest that OSLVs using UDP tunnels introduce 50% lower overhead, utilize 80% higher bandwidth and have 40-60% lower latency/jitter than those based on TCP","PeriodicalId":229045,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 13th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04EX969)","volume":"243 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental evaluations of open-source Linux-based VPN solutions\",\"authors\":\"Shashank Khanvilkar, A. Khokhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCCN.2004.1401619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Virtual private networks (VPNs) provide a low-cost alternative to leased lines and as such, are becoming increasingly popular among commercial and defense organizations for providing vital inter-office connectivity. Several commercial and open-source VPN products are now available that mainly differ in their capabilities to provide safe and secure services. In this paper, we study fifteen popular open-source Linux-based VPN solutions (OSLVs) and compare them with respect to network performances (bandwidth, delay and latency/jitter), supported features & functionalities (algorithm plug-ins and routing) and operational concerns (security and scalability). Experiments suggest that there is no single OSLV that excels in all the considered aspects and a combination of different solutions and/or tradeoff among desired characteristics may be required to deliver an optimal performance. Also network performance results suggest that OSLVs using UDP tunnels introduce 50% lower overhead, utilize 80% higher bandwidth and have 40-60% lower latency/jitter than those based on TCP\",\"PeriodicalId\":229045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 13th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04EX969)\",\"volume\":\"243 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 13th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04EX969)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2004.1401619\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 13th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04EX969)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2004.1401619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

虚拟专用网络(vpn)提供了租用线路的低成本替代方案,因此在商业和国防组织中越来越受欢迎,用于提供重要的办公室间连接。现在有几个商业的和开源的VPN产品,它们在提供安全服务的能力上有很大的不同。在本文中,我们研究了15个流行的基于linux的开源VPN解决方案(oslv),并对它们在网络性能(带宽、延迟和延迟/抖动)、支持的特性和功能(算法插件和路由)以及操作问题(安全性和可扩展性)方面进行了比较。实验表明,没有单一的OSLV在所有考虑的方面都表现出色,并且可能需要不同解决方案的组合和/或期望特性之间的权衡来交付最佳性能。此外,网络性能结果表明,使用UDP隧道的oslv比基于TCP的隧道引入的开销低50%,利用的带宽高80%,延迟/抖动低40-60%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental evaluations of open-source Linux-based VPN solutions
Virtual private networks (VPNs) provide a low-cost alternative to leased lines and as such, are becoming increasingly popular among commercial and defense organizations for providing vital inter-office connectivity. Several commercial and open-source VPN products are now available that mainly differ in their capabilities to provide safe and secure services. In this paper, we study fifteen popular open-source Linux-based VPN solutions (OSLVs) and compare them with respect to network performances (bandwidth, delay and latency/jitter), supported features & functionalities (algorithm plug-ins and routing) and operational concerns (security and scalability). Experiments suggest that there is no single OSLV that excels in all the considered aspects and a combination of different solutions and/or tradeoff among desired characteristics may be required to deliver an optimal performance. Also network performance results suggest that OSLVs using UDP tunnels introduce 50% lower overhead, utilize 80% higher bandwidth and have 40-60% lower latency/jitter than those based on TCP
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信