从“更像这样”到“比这样更好”

Haggai Roitman, D. Cohen, S. Hummel
{"title":"从“更像这样”到“比这样更好”","authors":"Haggai Roitman, D. Cohen, S. Hummel","doi":"10.1145/2970398.2970421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we address a novel retrieval problem we term the \"Better Than This\" problem. For a given pair of a user query to be answered by some search engine and a single example answer provided by the user that may or may not be a correct answer to the query, we determine whether or not there exists some better answer within the search engine. The approach we take is to test whether the user's provided answer can be used for relevance feedback in order to improve the ability of the search engine to better answer the user's query. If this is indeed the case, then we determine that the original answer provided by the user is good enough and there is no need to consider a better alternative. Otherwise, we decide that the best alternative that the search engine can provide should be considered as a better answer. Using a simulation based evaluation, we demonstrate that, our approach provides a better decision making solution to this problem, compared to several other alternatives.","PeriodicalId":443715,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From \\\"More Like This\\\" to \\\"Better Than This\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Haggai Roitman, D. Cohen, S. Hummel\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2970398.2970421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we address a novel retrieval problem we term the \\\"Better Than This\\\" problem. For a given pair of a user query to be answered by some search engine and a single example answer provided by the user that may or may not be a correct answer to the query, we determine whether or not there exists some better answer within the search engine. The approach we take is to test whether the user's provided answer can be used for relevance feedback in order to improve the ability of the search engine to better answer the user's query. If this is indeed the case, then we determine that the original answer provided by the user is good enough and there is no need to consider a better alternative. Otherwise, we decide that the best alternative that the search engine can provide should be considered as a better answer. Using a simulation based evaluation, we demonstrate that, our approach provides a better decision making solution to this problem, compared to several other alternatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2970398.2970421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2970398.2970421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们解决了一个新的检索问题,我们称之为“比这更好”的问题。对于由某个搜索引擎回答的用户查询和由用户提供的可能是也可能不是该查询的正确答案的单个示例答案的给定对,我们确定搜索引擎中是否存在更好的答案。我们采取的方法是测试用户提供的答案是否可以用于相关性反馈,以提高搜索引擎更好地回答用户查询的能力。如果确实是这种情况,那么我们确定用户提供的原始答案已经足够好了,不需要考虑更好的替代方案。否则,我们认为搜索引擎可以提供的最佳替代方案应该被视为更好的答案。使用基于模拟的评估,我们证明,与其他几种替代方案相比,我们的方法为该问题提供了更好的决策解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From "More Like This" to "Better Than This"
In this paper we address a novel retrieval problem we term the "Better Than This" problem. For a given pair of a user query to be answered by some search engine and a single example answer provided by the user that may or may not be a correct answer to the query, we determine whether or not there exists some better answer within the search engine. The approach we take is to test whether the user's provided answer can be used for relevance feedback in order to improve the ability of the search engine to better answer the user's query. If this is indeed the case, then we determine that the original answer provided by the user is good enough and there is no need to consider a better alternative. Otherwise, we decide that the best alternative that the search engine can provide should be considered as a better answer. Using a simulation based evaluation, we demonstrate that, our approach provides a better decision making solution to this problem, compared to several other alternatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信