应用贝叶斯网络进行穿透伤诊断推理

O. Ogunyemi, J. Clarke, B. Webber
{"title":"应用贝叶斯网络进行穿透伤诊断推理","authors":"O. Ogunyemi, J. Clarke, B. Webber","doi":"10.1109/CBMS.2000.856888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Describes a method for diagnostic reasoning under uncertainty that is used in TraumaSCAN, a computer-based system for assessing penetrating trauma. Uncertainty in assessing penetrating injuries arises from two different sources: the actual extent of damage associated with a particular injury mechanism may not be easily discernable, and there may be incomplete information about patient findings (signs, symptoms and test results) which provide clues about the extent of the injury. Bayesian networks are used in TraumaSCAN for diagnostic reasoning because they provide a mathematically sound means of making probabilistic inferences about the injury in the face of uncertainty. We also present a comparison of TraumaSCAN's results in assessing 26 actual gunshot wound cases with those of TraumAID, a validated rule-based expert system for the diagnosis and treatment of penetrating trauma.","PeriodicalId":189930,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 13th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. CBMS 2000","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Bayesian networks for diagnostic reasoning in penetrating injury assessment\",\"authors\":\"O. Ogunyemi, J. Clarke, B. Webber\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CBMS.2000.856888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Describes a method for diagnostic reasoning under uncertainty that is used in TraumaSCAN, a computer-based system for assessing penetrating trauma. Uncertainty in assessing penetrating injuries arises from two different sources: the actual extent of damage associated with a particular injury mechanism may not be easily discernable, and there may be incomplete information about patient findings (signs, symptoms and test results) which provide clues about the extent of the injury. Bayesian networks are used in TraumaSCAN for diagnostic reasoning because they provide a mathematically sound means of making probabilistic inferences about the injury in the face of uncertainty. We also present a comparison of TraumaSCAN's results in assessing 26 actual gunshot wound cases with those of TraumAID, a validated rule-based expert system for the diagnosis and treatment of penetrating trauma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 13th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. CBMS 2000\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 13th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. CBMS 2000\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2000.856888\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 13th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. CBMS 2000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2000.856888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

描述了一种在不确定情况下用于创伤诊断推理的方法,创伤诊断是一种基于计算机的穿透性创伤评估系统。评估穿透性损伤的不确定性来自两个不同的来源:与特定损伤机制相关的实际损伤程度可能不容易辨别,并且可能存在关于患者发现(体征、症状和测试结果)的不完整信息,这些信息提供了关于损伤程度的线索。贝叶斯网络在创伤can中用于诊断推理,因为它们提供了一种数学上合理的方法,可以在面对不确定性的情况下对损伤进行概率推断。我们还比较了创伤诊断和治疗专家系统——创伤诊断和治疗专家系统——与创伤诊断和治疗专家系统的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Bayesian networks for diagnostic reasoning in penetrating injury assessment
Describes a method for diagnostic reasoning under uncertainty that is used in TraumaSCAN, a computer-based system for assessing penetrating trauma. Uncertainty in assessing penetrating injuries arises from two different sources: the actual extent of damage associated with a particular injury mechanism may not be easily discernable, and there may be incomplete information about patient findings (signs, symptoms and test results) which provide clues about the extent of the injury. Bayesian networks are used in TraumaSCAN for diagnostic reasoning because they provide a mathematically sound means of making probabilistic inferences about the injury in the face of uncertainty. We also present a comparison of TraumaSCAN's results in assessing 26 actual gunshot wound cases with those of TraumAID, a validated rule-based expert system for the diagnosis and treatment of penetrating trauma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信