医疗审计和护理质量——一项新的英国倡议。

D Macpherson, T Mann
{"title":"医疗审计和护理质量——一项新的英国倡议。","authors":"D Macpherson,&nbsp;T Mann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1989 the Government in the UK announced a fundamental review of the financing of the National Health Service (NHS). Before the review, health authorities were responsible for both establishing need and providing services. Health Authorities are now allocated resources with which they commission services from managerially independent provider units. In the discussion that preceded the review concern was expressed about standards of clinical care given by doctors. It was recognised that these were professional issues which could not be directly addressed through the commissioning process, therefore within its NHS review proposals, the Government made clear its expectation that all doctors working in the NHS should participate in medical audit. This was defined as a systematic peer review of their work, including procedures used for diagnosis and treatment, the use of resources and the resulting outcome for patients. Managers should be provided with regular general reports of audit activity. These proposals for medical audit have been well received by the medical profession, who are now working closely with the Government to put them into practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"4 2","pages":"89-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical audit and quality of care--a new English initiative.\",\"authors\":\"D Macpherson,&nbsp;T Mann\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 1989 the Government in the UK announced a fundamental review of the financing of the National Health Service (NHS). Before the review, health authorities were responsible for both establishing need and providing services. Health Authorities are now allocated resources with which they commission services from managerially independent provider units. In the discussion that preceded the review concern was expressed about standards of clinical care given by doctors. It was recognised that these were professional issues which could not be directly addressed through the commissioning process, therefore within its NHS review proposals, the Government made clear its expectation that all doctors working in the NHS should participate in medical audit. This was defined as a systematic peer review of their work, including procedures used for diagnosis and treatment, the use of resources and the resulting outcome for patients. Managers should be provided with regular general reports of audit activity. These proposals for medical audit have been well received by the medical profession, who are now working closely with the Government to put them into practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"89-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1989年,联合王国政府宣布对国民保健服务(国民保健服务)的资金筹措进行根本审查。在审查之前,卫生当局负责确定需求并提供服务。卫生当局现在获得资源,委托管理上独立的提供单位提供服务。在审查之前的讨论中,对医生提供的临床护理标准表示了关注。人们认识到,这些都是专业问题,无法通过委托程序直接解决,因此,政府在其国民保健制度审查建议中明确表示,它期望在国民保健制度工作的所有医生都应参与医疗审计。这被定义为对他们的工作进行系统的同行评审,包括用于诊断和治疗的程序,资源的使用以及对患者的结果。应定期向管理人员提供审计活动的总报告。这些医疗审计建议得到了医学界的好评,他们目前正与政府密切合作,将这些建议付诸实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical audit and quality of care--a new English initiative.

In 1989 the Government in the UK announced a fundamental review of the financing of the National Health Service (NHS). Before the review, health authorities were responsible for both establishing need and providing services. Health Authorities are now allocated resources with which they commission services from managerially independent provider units. In the discussion that preceded the review concern was expressed about standards of clinical care given by doctors. It was recognised that these were professional issues which could not be directly addressed through the commissioning process, therefore within its NHS review proposals, the Government made clear its expectation that all doctors working in the NHS should participate in medical audit. This was defined as a systematic peer review of their work, including procedures used for diagnosis and treatment, the use of resources and the resulting outcome for patients. Managers should be provided with regular general reports of audit activity. These proposals for medical audit have been well received by the medical profession, who are now working closely with the Government to put them into practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信