医生对旨在改善子宫颈细胞检验抽样质量的各种反馈意见的反应。

F Buntinx, J A Knottnerus, H F Crebolder, G G Essed
{"title":"医生对旨在改善子宫颈细胞检验抽样质量的各种反馈意见的反应。","authors":"F Buntinx,&nbsp;J A Knottnerus,&nbsp;H F Crebolder,&nbsp;G G Essed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three different forms of feedback designed to improve the sampling quality of cervical smears were tested in a randomized controlled trial among 179 physicians. The reactions of the doctors to the various interventions are reported as they appeared from their answers in a questionnaire. The influence of the interventions on the employed sampling technique is described on the basis of their answers to a telephone inquiry. The inclusion in laboratory protocols of an evaluation of the sampling quality of the submitted smears was largely appreciated, as was specific advice offered on indication. Monthly overviews comparing the performance of the individual doctor to that of his peers were esteemed by three out of four. Further information, help or training was requested more frequently than average by physicians obtaining inadequately sampled smears relatively often. The number of doctors using the combined spatula and Cytobrush method as sampling technique doubled during the study period.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"4 2","pages":"161-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reactions of doctors to various forms of feedback designed to improve the sampling quality of cervical smears.\",\"authors\":\"F Buntinx,&nbsp;J A Knottnerus,&nbsp;H F Crebolder,&nbsp;G G Essed\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three different forms of feedback designed to improve the sampling quality of cervical smears were tested in a randomized controlled trial among 179 physicians. The reactions of the doctors to the various interventions are reported as they appeared from their answers in a questionnaire. The influence of the interventions on the employed sampling technique is described on the basis of their answers to a telephone inquiry. The inclusion in laboratory protocols of an evaluation of the sampling quality of the submitted smears was largely appreciated, as was specific advice offered on indication. Monthly overviews comparing the performance of the individual doctor to that of his peers were esteemed by three out of four. Further information, help or training was requested more frequently than average by physicians obtaining inadequately sampled smears relatively often. The number of doctors using the combined spatula and Cytobrush method as sampling technique doubled during the study period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"161-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在179名医生的随机对照试验中,测试了三种不同形式的反馈,旨在提高宫颈涂片的抽样质量。医生对各种干预措施的反应是根据他们在问卷中的回答来报告的。干预措施对所采用的抽样技术的影响是根据他们对电话询问的回答来描述的。在实验室规程中列入了对所提交的涂片取样质量的评价,并就指征问题提出了具体建议,这在很大程度上受到赞赏。每月将医生个人的表现与同行的表现进行比较的综述得到了四分之三的人的认可。进一步的信息,帮助或培训的要求比平均频率更高的医生获得不充分的抽样涂片相对频繁。在研究期间,使用混合刮刀和细胞刷法作为采样技术的医生数量增加了一倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reactions of doctors to various forms of feedback designed to improve the sampling quality of cervical smears.

Three different forms of feedback designed to improve the sampling quality of cervical smears were tested in a randomized controlled trial among 179 physicians. The reactions of the doctors to the various interventions are reported as they appeared from their answers in a questionnaire. The influence of the interventions on the employed sampling technique is described on the basis of their answers to a telephone inquiry. The inclusion in laboratory protocols of an evaluation of the sampling quality of the submitted smears was largely appreciated, as was specific advice offered on indication. Monthly overviews comparing the performance of the individual doctor to that of his peers were esteemed by three out of four. Further information, help or training was requested more frequently than average by physicians obtaining inadequately sampled smears relatively often. The number of doctors using the combined spatula and Cytobrush method as sampling technique doubled during the study period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信