伊斯兰教法恐吓行业和时间的冲突

Steven Fink
{"title":"伊斯兰教法恐吓行业和时间的冲突","authors":"Steven Fink","doi":"10.17077/2168-538X.1092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Multiple alarms over Islamic law, or shariah, have resounded in the United States during the second decade of the twenty-first century. These alarms perpetuate the notion of a clash of civilizations, pitting Islam versus the West. Instead of discussing the clash of civilizations thesis, however, this article proposes that a clash of temporalities has been constructed by a “shariah scare industry.” Focusing on the Center for Security Policy and Nonie Darwish, this article discloses the shariah scare argument that Muslims and non-Muslims experience time in two contrasting manners, what I call frozen past time and ominous future time.","PeriodicalId":345848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Multidisciplinary Studies: Mathal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Shariah Scare Industry and the Clash of Temporalities\",\"authors\":\"Steven Fink\",\"doi\":\"10.17077/2168-538X.1092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Multiple alarms over Islamic law, or shariah, have resounded in the United States during the second decade of the twenty-first century. These alarms perpetuate the notion of a clash of civilizations, pitting Islam versus the West. Instead of discussing the clash of civilizations thesis, however, this article proposes that a clash of temporalities has been constructed by a “shariah scare industry.” Focusing on the Center for Security Policy and Nonie Darwish, this article discloses the shariah scare argument that Muslims and non-Muslims experience time in two contrasting manners, what I call frozen past time and ominous future time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Multidisciplinary Studies: Mathal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Multidisciplinary Studies: Mathal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-538X.1092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Multidisciplinary Studies: Mathal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-538X.1092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在21世纪的第二个十年里,对伊斯兰教法的多次警告在美国回响。这些警告延续了文明冲突的概念,使伊斯兰与西方对立起来。然而,本文并没有讨论文明冲突的论点,而是提出了一种暂时性的冲突是由“伊斯兰教法恐吓产业”构建的。本文聚焦于安全政策中心和Nonie Darwish,揭示了伊斯兰教法恐慌的论点,即穆斯林和非穆斯林以两种截然不同的方式体验时间,我称之为凝固的过去时间和不祥的未来时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Shariah Scare Industry and the Clash of Temporalities
: Multiple alarms over Islamic law, or shariah, have resounded in the United States during the second decade of the twenty-first century. These alarms perpetuate the notion of a clash of civilizations, pitting Islam versus the West. Instead of discussing the clash of civilizations thesis, however, this article proposes that a clash of temporalities has been constructed by a “shariah scare industry.” Focusing on the Center for Security Policy and Nonie Darwish, this article discloses the shariah scare argument that Muslims and non-Muslims experience time in two contrasting manners, what I call frozen past time and ominous future time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信