评分:学生终身职位和晋升评分量表

Stanley N. Miller
{"title":"评分:学生终身职位和晋升评分量表","authors":"Stanley N. Miller","doi":"10.1080/00193089.1984.10533849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"-.75 to +.87 (5). Despite this inconsistency, an increasing number of universities, including my own, re quire student evaluation of teachers as one piece of data among others for tenure and promotion decisions. One also suspects that colleges whose primary function is teaching place an increasing importance on student rating scales. Admittedly teacher effectiveness is dif ficult to assess because recognized and unrecognized variables are so numerous and a definition of effective teaching is elusive. Yet an attempt must be made because teaching effectiveness is a universal criterion for tenure and promotion decisions, and rightly so. Because of the pressure to evaluate, many have suc cumbed to the allure of student rating scales that pro","PeriodicalId":126898,"journal":{"name":"Improving College and University Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ratings: Student Rating Scales for Tenure and Promotion\",\"authors\":\"Stanley N. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00193089.1984.10533849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"-.75 to +.87 (5). Despite this inconsistency, an increasing number of universities, including my own, re quire student evaluation of teachers as one piece of data among others for tenure and promotion decisions. One also suspects that colleges whose primary function is teaching place an increasing importance on student rating scales. Admittedly teacher effectiveness is dif ficult to assess because recognized and unrecognized variables are so numerous and a definition of effective teaching is elusive. Yet an attempt must be made because teaching effectiveness is a universal criterion for tenure and promotion decisions, and rightly so. Because of the pressure to evaluate, many have suc cumbed to the allure of student rating scales that pro\",\"PeriodicalId\":126898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Improving College and University Teaching\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Improving College and University Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1984.10533849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improving College and University Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1984.10533849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

-.75到+ 0.87尽管存在这种不一致,但越来越多的大学,包括我所在的大学,要求学生对教师的评价作为决定终身教职和晋升的一项数据。人们还怀疑,以教学为主要功能的大学越来越重视学生的评分量表。不可否认,教师的有效性很难评估,因为公认和未公认的变量是如此之多,有效教学的定义是难以捉摸的。然而,必须做出尝试,因为教学效果是终身教职和晋升决策的普遍标准,这是正确的。由于评估的压力,许多人都屈服于学生评分量表的诱惑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ratings: Student Rating Scales for Tenure and Promotion
-.75 to +.87 (5). Despite this inconsistency, an increasing number of universities, including my own, re quire student evaluation of teachers as one piece of data among others for tenure and promotion decisions. One also suspects that colleges whose primary function is teaching place an increasing importance on student rating scales. Admittedly teacher effectiveness is dif ficult to assess because recognized and unrecognized variables are so numerous and a definition of effective teaching is elusive. Yet an attempt must be made because teaching effectiveness is a universal criterion for tenure and promotion decisions, and rightly so. Because of the pressure to evaluate, many have suc cumbed to the allure of student rating scales that pro
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信