刺激和观看任务类型对基于学习的视觉显著性模型的影响

Binbin Ye, Yusuke Sugano, Yoichi Sato
{"title":"刺激和观看任务类型对基于学习的视觉显著性模型的影响","authors":"Binbin Ye, Yusuke Sugano, Yoichi Sato","doi":"10.1145/2578153.2578199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning-based approaches using actual human gaze data have been proven to be an efficient way to acquire accurate visual saliency models and attracted much interest in recent years. However, it still remains yet to be answered how different types of stimulus (e.g., fractal images, and natural images with or without human faces) and viewing tasks (e.g., free viewing or a preference rating task) affect learned visual saliency models. In this study, we quantitatively investigate how learned saliency models differ when using datasets collected in different settings (image contextual level and viewing task) and discuss the importance of choosing appropriate experimental settings.","PeriodicalId":142459,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of stimulus and viewing task types on a learning-based visual saliency model\",\"authors\":\"Binbin Ye, Yusuke Sugano, Yoichi Sato\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2578153.2578199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning-based approaches using actual human gaze data have been proven to be an efficient way to acquire accurate visual saliency models and attracted much interest in recent years. However, it still remains yet to be answered how different types of stimulus (e.g., fractal images, and natural images with or without human faces) and viewing tasks (e.g., free viewing or a preference rating task) affect learned visual saliency models. In this study, we quantitatively investigate how learned saliency models differ when using datasets collected in different settings (image contextual level and viewing task) and discuss the importance of choosing appropriate experimental settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2578153.2578199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2578153.2578199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,基于学习的人眼注视数据提取方法已被证明是一种获取精确视觉显著性模型的有效方法。然而,不同类型的刺激(例如,分形图像,有或没有人脸的自然图像)和观看任务(例如,自由观看或偏好评级任务)如何影响习得的视觉显著性模型仍有待回答。在本研究中,我们定量研究了在不同设置(图像上下文水平和观看任务)中收集的数据集时学习显著性模型的差异,并讨论了选择适当实验设置的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of stimulus and viewing task types on a learning-based visual saliency model
Learning-based approaches using actual human gaze data have been proven to be an efficient way to acquire accurate visual saliency models and attracted much interest in recent years. However, it still remains yet to be answered how different types of stimulus (e.g., fractal images, and natural images with or without human faces) and viewing tasks (e.g., free viewing or a preference rating task) affect learned visual saliency models. In this study, we quantitatively investigate how learned saliency models differ when using datasets collected in different settings (image contextual level and viewing task) and discuss the importance of choosing appropriate experimental settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信