季度总收益的时间序列性质

Koren M. Jo, William M. Cready
{"title":"季度总收益的时间序列性质","authors":"Koren M. Jo, William M. Cready","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3565644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This analysis examines the time-series properties of quarterly aggregate earnings. We find that when aggregated, quarterly earnings can be fairly well described as following a simple random walk (RW) process. That is, the best historical time-series predictor for quarterly aggregated earnings is aggregated earnings from the prior quarter and this specification, in particular, outperforms a seasonal random walk (SRW) specification. Hence, unlike firm level earnings, the seasonal earnings lag is not the best single value predictor for aggregate earnings. When we consider more complicated multi-variable RW changes specifications, we find that the use of first or second order autocorrelation provides some improvement in specification. Finally, drawing on prior work by Sadka and Sadka (2009), we demonstrate the empirical relevance of the choice between an RW and an SRW “surprise” specification by identifying substantive differences in how each is predicted by lagged market returns.","PeriodicalId":330048,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-Series Properties of Quarterly Aggregate Earnings\",\"authors\":\"Koren M. Jo, William M. Cready\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3565644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This analysis examines the time-series properties of quarterly aggregate earnings. We find that when aggregated, quarterly earnings can be fairly well described as following a simple random walk (RW) process. That is, the best historical time-series predictor for quarterly aggregated earnings is aggregated earnings from the prior quarter and this specification, in particular, outperforms a seasonal random walk (SRW) specification. Hence, unlike firm level earnings, the seasonal earnings lag is not the best single value predictor for aggregate earnings. When we consider more complicated multi-variable RW changes specifications, we find that the use of first or second order autocorrelation provides some improvement in specification. Finally, drawing on prior work by Sadka and Sadka (2009), we demonstrate the empirical relevance of the choice between an RW and an SRW “surprise” specification by identifying substantive differences in how each is predicted by lagged market returns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3565644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3565644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个分析检验了季度总收益的时间序列属性。我们发现,当汇总时,季度收益可以很好地描述为遵循一个简单的随机漫步(RW)过程。也就是说,季度累计收益的最佳历史时间序列预测器是前一季度的累计收益,特别是该规范优于季节性随机漫步(SRW)规范。因此,与公司层面的收益不同,季节性收益滞后并不是总收益的最佳单一价值预测指标。当我们考虑更复杂的多变量RW变化规范时,我们发现使用一阶或二阶自相关可以改善规范。最后,借鉴Sadka和Sadka(2009)之前的工作,我们通过识别滞后市场回报如何预测RW和SRW“惊喜”规范之间的实质性差异,证明了RW和SRW“惊喜”规范之间选择的经验相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time-Series Properties of Quarterly Aggregate Earnings
This analysis examines the time-series properties of quarterly aggregate earnings. We find that when aggregated, quarterly earnings can be fairly well described as following a simple random walk (RW) process. That is, the best historical time-series predictor for quarterly aggregated earnings is aggregated earnings from the prior quarter and this specification, in particular, outperforms a seasonal random walk (SRW) specification. Hence, unlike firm level earnings, the seasonal earnings lag is not the best single value predictor for aggregate earnings. When we consider more complicated multi-variable RW changes specifications, we find that the use of first or second order autocorrelation provides some improvement in specification. Finally, drawing on prior work by Sadka and Sadka (2009), we demonstrate the empirical relevance of the choice between an RW and an SRW “surprise” specification by identifying substantive differences in how each is predicted by lagged market returns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信