人道主义干预的后果

Theoria, Beograd Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.2298/theo1903145l

Aleksandar Lukić

{"title":"人道主义干预的后果","authors":"Aleksandar Lukić","doi":"10.2298/theo1903145l","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author explores the problem of humanitarian interventions\n and critically examines theories of intervention. According to those\n theories, the duty to react is one of the key arguments for intervening.\n However, it turns out that such a duty is, as a rule, linked to some\n political interest which in fact constitutes a primary motive for\n intervention. Humanity, therefore, fails in such actions that are, as a\n rule, military and have a coercive and destructive character.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consequences of humanitarian interventionism\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandar Lukić\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/theo1903145l\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the author explores the problem of humanitarian interventions\\n and critically examines theories of intervention. According to those\\n theories, the duty to react is one of the key arguments for intervening.\\n However, it turns out that such a duty is, as a rule, linked to some\\n political interest which in fact constitutes a primary motive for\\n intervention. Humanity, therefore, fails in such actions that are, as a\\n rule, military and have a coercive and destructive character.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoria, Beograd\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoria, Beograd\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo1903145l\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoria, Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo1903145l","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中，作者探讨了人道主义干预的问题，并批判性地审视了干预的理论。根据这些理论，反应义务是干预的关键论据之一。然而，事实证明，这种义务通常与某种政治利益有关，而这种政治利益实际上构成了干预的主要动机。因此，人类在这些通常是军事的、具有强制性和破坏性的行动中失败了。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Consequences of humanitarian interventionism

In this paper, the author explores the problem of humanitarian interventions and critically examines theories of intervention. According to those theories, the duty to react is one of the key arguments for intervening. However, it turns out that such a duty is, as a rule, linked to some political interest which in fact constitutes a primary motive for intervention. Humanity, therefore, fails in such actions that are, as a rule, military and have a coercive and destructive character.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Theoria, Beograd

自引率

0.00%

发文量