重新审视平衡账面假说- NFL的投注者偏好和结果

R. Paul, A. Weinbach
{"title":"重新审视平衡账面假说- NFL的投注者偏好和结果","authors":"R. Paul, A. Weinbach","doi":"10.5750/jpm.v15i3.1961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data on betting percentages, both in terms of number of bets and actual money wagered, is still difficult to find.  Sports Action Network, in their premium access service, does provide this data in terms of both number of bets and money bet.  For the2020 NFL season, it was found that the balanced book could be rejected as bettors were shown to prefer road favorites, big favorites, and the over at the highest totals.  Allowing this imbalance in the sides market appeared profitable for the book as the underdog won more often than implied by efficiency, while totals were evenly split.","PeriodicalId":352536,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prediction Markets","volume":"185 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the Balanced Book Hypothesis – Bettor Preferences and Results in the NFL\",\"authors\":\"R. Paul, A. Weinbach\",\"doi\":\"10.5750/jpm.v15i3.1961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data on betting percentages, both in terms of number of bets and actual money wagered, is still difficult to find.  Sports Action Network, in their premium access service, does provide this data in terms of both number of bets and money bet.  For the2020 NFL season, it was found that the balanced book could be rejected as bettors were shown to prefer road favorites, big favorites, and the over at the highest totals.  Allowing this imbalance in the sides market appeared profitable for the book as the underdog won more often than implied by efficiency, while totals were evenly split.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Prediction Markets\",\"volume\":\"185 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Prediction Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5750/jpm.v15i3.1961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prediction Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/jpm.v15i3.1961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于投注百分比的数据,无论是从投注数量还是实际投注金额来看,仍然很难找到。Sports Action Network,在他们的高级访问服务中,确实提供了关于下注数量和下注金额的数据。对于2020年NFL赛季,人们发现平衡账簿可能会被拒绝,因为投注者被证明更喜欢客场热门,大热门和最高总数。允许双方市场的这种不平衡似乎是有利可图的,因为弱者赢得的次数比效率所暗示的要多,而总数则是平均分配的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting the Balanced Book Hypothesis – Bettor Preferences and Results in the NFL
Data on betting percentages, both in terms of number of bets and actual money wagered, is still difficult to find.  Sports Action Network, in their premium access service, does provide this data in terms of both number of bets and money bet.  For the2020 NFL season, it was found that the balanced book could be rejected as bettors were shown to prefer road favorites, big favorites, and the over at the highest totals.  Allowing this imbalance in the sides market appeared profitable for the book as the underdog won more often than implied by efficiency, while totals were evenly split.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信