他们恐惧的颜色和内容:对种族定性的简短分析

M. Cherry
{"title":"他们恐惧的颜色和内容:对种族定性的简短分析","authors":"M. Cherry","doi":"10.5840/RADPHILREV201619373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In White Privilege and Black Rights, Naomi Zack looks at comparative injustice in the US by analyzing the ways in which whites and blacks are treated by the criminal justice system. “Comparative injustice to American blacks has a very long history that includes the broadly recognized injustice of slavery and the oblivion of many American whites to the conditions under which American blacks now live” (64). In other words, blacks have historically been treated worse than whites, they have had less of a fair chance than whites, and whites have been privileged to be ignorant of the conditions experienced by blacks. The images that serve as examples and proof of comparative injustice for Zack are the police homicides of Oscar Grant, Trayvon Martin, Tamir Rice, and many others. Zack notes that between 2005 and 2011, a white police officer killed a black person twice a week. Racial profiling preceded 43 percent of 2012 killings of blacks by white police officers. The police do not treat all American citizens in this way. Instead, this is the way the police treat blacks. If applicative justice aims to bring the legal treatment of blacks on par with the legal treatment of whites, we have lots of work to do.","PeriodicalId":402397,"journal":{"name":"Radical Philosophy Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Color and Content of Their Fears: A Short Analysis of Racial Profiling\",\"authors\":\"M. Cherry\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/RADPHILREV201619373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In White Privilege and Black Rights, Naomi Zack looks at comparative injustice in the US by analyzing the ways in which whites and blacks are treated by the criminal justice system. “Comparative injustice to American blacks has a very long history that includes the broadly recognized injustice of slavery and the oblivion of many American whites to the conditions under which American blacks now live” (64). In other words, blacks have historically been treated worse than whites, they have had less of a fair chance than whites, and whites have been privileged to be ignorant of the conditions experienced by blacks. The images that serve as examples and proof of comparative injustice for Zack are the police homicides of Oscar Grant, Trayvon Martin, Tamir Rice, and many others. Zack notes that between 2005 and 2011, a white police officer killed a black person twice a week. Racial profiling preceded 43 percent of 2012 killings of blacks by white police officers. The police do not treat all American citizens in this way. Instead, this is the way the police treat blacks. If applicative justice aims to bring the legal treatment of blacks on par with the legal treatment of whites, we have lots of work to do.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radical Philosophy Review\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radical Philosophy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/RADPHILREV201619373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radical Philosophy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/RADPHILREV201619373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在《白人特权与黑人权利》一书中,内奥米·扎克通过分析刑事司法系统对待白人和黑人的方式,审视了美国的相对不公正。“对美国黑人的相对不公正有着很长的历史,其中包括公认的奴隶制的不公正,以及许多美国白人对美国黑人现在生活条件的遗忘”(64)。换句话说,黑人历来受到的待遇比白人差,他们获得的公平机会比白人少,而白人一直享有特权,对黑人所经历的状况一无所知。对扎克来说,警察杀害奥斯卡·格兰特、特雷沃恩·马丁、塔米尔·赖斯和其他许多人,是相对不公正的例子和证据。扎克指出,在2005年至2011年间,一名白人警察每周杀死一名黑人两次。2012年白人警察杀害黑人的案件中,有43%的案件是种族定性导致的。警察并不是这样对待所有的美国公民。相反,这就是警察对待黑人的方式。如果应用正义的目的是使黑人的法律待遇与白人的法律待遇平等,我们还有很多工作要做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Color and Content of Their Fears: A Short Analysis of Racial Profiling
In White Privilege and Black Rights, Naomi Zack looks at comparative injustice in the US by analyzing the ways in which whites and blacks are treated by the criminal justice system. “Comparative injustice to American blacks has a very long history that includes the broadly recognized injustice of slavery and the oblivion of many American whites to the conditions under which American blacks now live” (64). In other words, blacks have historically been treated worse than whites, they have had less of a fair chance than whites, and whites have been privileged to be ignorant of the conditions experienced by blacks. The images that serve as examples and proof of comparative injustice for Zack are the police homicides of Oscar Grant, Trayvon Martin, Tamir Rice, and many others. Zack notes that between 2005 and 2011, a white police officer killed a black person twice a week. Racial profiling preceded 43 percent of 2012 killings of blacks by white police officers. The police do not treat all American citizens in this way. Instead, this is the way the police treat blacks. If applicative justice aims to bring the legal treatment of blacks on par with the legal treatment of whites, we have lots of work to do.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信