基于规则的混合动力汽车动力系统控制与等效能耗最小化策略:硬件在环评估

P. G. Anselma
{"title":"基于规则的混合动力汽车动力系统控制与等效能耗最小化策略:硬件在环评估","authors":"P. G. Anselma","doi":"10.1109/isie51582.2022.9831702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy management systems are crucial in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). Other than enhanced energy economy, a proper energy management system must guarantee acceptable driving comfort, compliance with the allowed battery state-of-charge window, and on-board computational efficiency. While several studies from the literature have compared different state-of-the-art real-time HEV powertrain energy management strategies, not much work has been performed on the hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) assessment of these control approaches. This paper aims at answering the identified research need by performing an experimental HIL assessment of different state-of-the-art HEV control strategies including a rule-based control (RBC) approach and three different formulations of equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS), both of traditional and adaptive type. A parallel-through-the-road HEV is considered for this case study. Various assessment criteria are retained including HEV fuel economy, measured computational time, and comfort of the ride in terms of frequency of de/activation events and smoothness of the controlled value of torque over time for the internal combustion engine. Obtained results suggest that the RBC approach can achieve improved performance in almost all the retained evaluation criteria. The traditional ECMS can outperform RBC in terms of fuel economy, yet by undermining both ride comfort and compliance with the battery SOC window. Finally, an adaptive ECMS can outperform the RBC in terms of fuel economy while ensuring acceptable comfort and compliance with the battery SOC window, yet at a significant computational cost increase.","PeriodicalId":194172,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rule-based Control and Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicle Powertrains: a Hardware-in-the-loop Assessment\",\"authors\":\"P. G. Anselma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/isie51582.2022.9831702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Energy management systems are crucial in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). Other than enhanced energy economy, a proper energy management system must guarantee acceptable driving comfort, compliance with the allowed battery state-of-charge window, and on-board computational efficiency. While several studies from the literature have compared different state-of-the-art real-time HEV powertrain energy management strategies, not much work has been performed on the hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) assessment of these control approaches. This paper aims at answering the identified research need by performing an experimental HIL assessment of different state-of-the-art HEV control strategies including a rule-based control (RBC) approach and three different formulations of equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS), both of traditional and adaptive type. A parallel-through-the-road HEV is considered for this case study. Various assessment criteria are retained including HEV fuel economy, measured computational time, and comfort of the ride in terms of frequency of de/activation events and smoothness of the controlled value of torque over time for the internal combustion engine. Obtained results suggest that the RBC approach can achieve improved performance in almost all the retained evaluation criteria. The traditional ECMS can outperform RBC in terms of fuel economy, yet by undermining both ride comfort and compliance with the battery SOC window. Finally, an adaptive ECMS can outperform the RBC in terms of fuel economy while ensuring acceptable comfort and compliance with the battery SOC window, yet at a significant computational cost increase.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/isie51582.2022.9831702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/isie51582.2022.9831702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源管理系统在混合动力电动汽车(hev)中至关重要。除了提高能源经济性外,适当的能源管理系统还必须保证可接受的驾驶舒适性,符合允许的电池状态充电窗口,以及车载计算效率。虽然文献中的一些研究比较了不同的最先进的实时HEV动力系统能量管理策略,但对这些控制方法的硬件在环(HIL)评估进行的工作并不多。本文旨在通过对不同的最先进的HEV控制策略进行实验HIL评估,包括基于规则的控制(RBC)方法和三种不同的等效消耗最小化策略(ECMS)公式,包括传统和自适应类型,以满足确定的研究需求。本案例研究考虑了一种平行穿过道路的混合动力汽车。保留了各种评估标准,包括混合动力汽车的燃油经济性、测量的计算时间、根据熄灯/激活事件的频率和内燃机控制扭矩值随时间的平稳性来衡量的乘坐舒适性。得到的结果表明,RBC方法可以在几乎所有保留的评价标准中取得改进的性能。传统的ECMS在燃油经济性方面优于RBC,但会降低驾驶舒适性和电池SOC窗口的合规性。最后,自适应ECMS可以在燃油经济性方面优于RBC,同时确保可接受的舒适性和符合电池SOC窗口,但计算成本显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rule-based Control and Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicle Powertrains: a Hardware-in-the-loop Assessment
Energy management systems are crucial in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). Other than enhanced energy economy, a proper energy management system must guarantee acceptable driving comfort, compliance with the allowed battery state-of-charge window, and on-board computational efficiency. While several studies from the literature have compared different state-of-the-art real-time HEV powertrain energy management strategies, not much work has been performed on the hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) assessment of these control approaches. This paper aims at answering the identified research need by performing an experimental HIL assessment of different state-of-the-art HEV control strategies including a rule-based control (RBC) approach and three different formulations of equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS), both of traditional and adaptive type. A parallel-through-the-road HEV is considered for this case study. Various assessment criteria are retained including HEV fuel economy, measured computational time, and comfort of the ride in terms of frequency of de/activation events and smoothness of the controlled value of torque over time for the internal combustion engine. Obtained results suggest that the RBC approach can achieve improved performance in almost all the retained evaluation criteria. The traditional ECMS can outperform RBC in terms of fuel economy, yet by undermining both ride comfort and compliance with the battery SOC window. Finally, an adaptive ECMS can outperform the RBC in terms of fuel economy while ensuring acceptable comfort and compliance with the battery SOC window, yet at a significant computational cost increase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信