固定成本和模糊需求下的最优价格与订货策略研究

Jian Yang
{"title":"固定成本和模糊需求下的最优价格与订货策略研究","authors":"Jian Yang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3554042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study joint inventory-price control in which a firm chooses among a finite number of prices to influence the demand to be realized; also, the firm’s ordering activities incur fixed setup costs. While intending to settle down on an optimal price and figure out an optimal ordering policy all catering to the long-run average criterion, the firm is ambiguous about the stationary distribution of the random demand that it is to face under each price. We propose an adaptive policy in which periods are grouped into intervals, with each being associated with one single price and one single ordering policy. Pricing is based on a learning-while-doing trade-off: a price with the least number of interval visits will be chosen when this number is below a threshold associated with the total number of interval visits under all prices; otherwise, the chosen price will be one with the most promising profit prospect estimated from past experiences. Interval-wise ordering relies on an (s,S) policy most suitable for the empirical distribution learned from past experiences under the chosen price. The power at which the policy’s regret grows in the horizon length T would be below (3 +√29)/10 ≃ 0.839 even when demand patterns are fairly ambiguous. When demand realizations are further confined to a finite support, the bound would be reducible to √2/2 ≃ 0.707.","PeriodicalId":321987,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Pricing (Topic)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning the Best Price and Ordering Policy under Fixed Costs and Ambiguous Demand\",\"authors\":\"Jian Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3554042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study joint inventory-price control in which a firm chooses among a finite number of prices to influence the demand to be realized; also, the firm’s ordering activities incur fixed setup costs. While intending to settle down on an optimal price and figure out an optimal ordering policy all catering to the long-run average criterion, the firm is ambiguous about the stationary distribution of the random demand that it is to face under each price. We propose an adaptive policy in which periods are grouped into intervals, with each being associated with one single price and one single ordering policy. Pricing is based on a learning-while-doing trade-off: a price with the least number of interval visits will be chosen when this number is below a threshold associated with the total number of interval visits under all prices; otherwise, the chosen price will be one with the most promising profit prospect estimated from past experiences. Interval-wise ordering relies on an (s,S) policy most suitable for the empirical distribution learned from past experiences under the chosen price. The power at which the policy’s regret grows in the horizon length T would be below (3 +√29)/10 ≃ 0.839 even when demand patterns are fairly ambiguous. When demand realizations are further confined to a finite support, the bound would be reducible to √2/2 ≃ 0.707.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Pricing (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Pricing (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3554042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Pricing (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3554042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们研究了库存-价格联合控制,其中企业在有限数量的价格中选择影响需求实现的价格;此外,公司的订购活动产生固定的设置成本。当企业想要确定一个最优价格并找出一个满足长期平均标准的最优订购策略时,它对在每个价格下所面临的随机需求的平稳分布是模糊的。我们提出了一种自适应策略,其中将周期分组为区间,每个区间与一个单一价格和一个单一订购策略相关联。定价基于边做边学的权衡:当间隔访问次数低于与所有价格下的间隔访问总次数相关的阈值时,将选择间隔访问次数最少的价格;否则,所选择的价格将是根据以往经验估计出的最具盈利前景的价格。区间明智排序依赖于(s, s)策略,该策略最适合于从过去经验中获得的经验分布。当需求模式相当模糊时,政策后悔在视界长度T上的增长权力也在(3 +√29)/10以下。当需求实现进一步局限于一个有限的支持时,该界可约为√2/2≃0.707。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning the Best Price and Ordering Policy under Fixed Costs and Ambiguous Demand
We study joint inventory-price control in which a firm chooses among a finite number of prices to influence the demand to be realized; also, the firm’s ordering activities incur fixed setup costs. While intending to settle down on an optimal price and figure out an optimal ordering policy all catering to the long-run average criterion, the firm is ambiguous about the stationary distribution of the random demand that it is to face under each price. We propose an adaptive policy in which periods are grouped into intervals, with each being associated with one single price and one single ordering policy. Pricing is based on a learning-while-doing trade-off: a price with the least number of interval visits will be chosen when this number is below a threshold associated with the total number of interval visits under all prices; otherwise, the chosen price will be one with the most promising profit prospect estimated from past experiences. Interval-wise ordering relies on an (s,S) policy most suitable for the empirical distribution learned from past experiences under the chosen price. The power at which the policy’s regret grows in the horizon length T would be below (3 +√29)/10 ≃ 0.839 even when demand patterns are fairly ambiguous. When demand realizations are further confined to a finite support, the bound would be reducible to √2/2 ≃ 0.707.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信