学生对土木工程课程中使用项目式学习的看法

T. El-Maaddawy, Hilal El-Hassan, Hamad Al Jassmi
{"title":"学生对土木工程课程中使用项目式学习的看法","authors":"T. El-Maaddawy, Hilal El-Hassan, Hamad Al Jassmi","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Project-based learning (PBL) is a student-centered approach in which students learn by solving real-life problems in a teamwork environment. Little is known about how students in different academic levels perceive the effectiveness of PBL approach. This study aims to compare and analyze students' perceptions of the use of PBL in different undergraduate- and graduate-level civil engineering courses. Students' perceptions of the effectiveness of the partial use of PBL in civil engineering courses to improve their understanding of course topics and develop their life skills were collected through a questionnaire distributed at the end of the semester. Data was collected from 104 students enrolled in five different undergraduate and graduate civil engineering courses. Results showed that students of the junior-level course held more positive attitude towards collaboration and teamwork rather than students of senior-level or graduate-level courses. The mean scores of the survey questions related to teamwork, collaboration, and communication skills tended to decrease with an increase in the course level. Junior-level students exhibited the highest degree of satisfaction in response to the survey question related to the degree of enjoyment when working in groups. Due to the difficulty in scheduling meetings, ineffective communications were noted by graduate students. They recorded the lowest mean scores for the survey questions related to teamwork/collaboration skills and degree of enjoyment when working in groups. Survey results indicated, however, that PBL was more effective in improving understanding of course topics, self-regulation and self-learning skills of the graduate students rather than undergraduate students.","PeriodicalId":102826,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student perceptions of the use of project-based learning in civil engineering courses\",\"authors\":\"T. El-Maaddawy, Hilal El-Hassan, Hamad Al Jassmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Project-based learning (PBL) is a student-centered approach in which students learn by solving real-life problems in a teamwork environment. Little is known about how students in different academic levels perceive the effectiveness of PBL approach. This study aims to compare and analyze students' perceptions of the use of PBL in different undergraduate- and graduate-level civil engineering courses. Students' perceptions of the effectiveness of the partial use of PBL in civil engineering courses to improve their understanding of course topics and develop their life skills were collected through a questionnaire distributed at the end of the semester. Data was collected from 104 students enrolled in five different undergraduate and graduate civil engineering courses. Results showed that students of the junior-level course held more positive attitude towards collaboration and teamwork rather than students of senior-level or graduate-level courses. The mean scores of the survey questions related to teamwork, collaboration, and communication skills tended to decrease with an increase in the course level. Junior-level students exhibited the highest degree of satisfaction in response to the survey question related to the degree of enjoyment when working in groups. Due to the difficulty in scheduling meetings, ineffective communications were noted by graduate students. They recorded the lowest mean scores for the survey questions related to teamwork/collaboration skills and degree of enjoyment when working in groups. Survey results indicated, however, that PBL was more effective in improving understanding of course topics, self-regulation and self-learning skills of the graduate students rather than undergraduate students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

基于项目的学习(PBL)是一种以学生为中心的学习方法,学生在团队合作的环境中通过解决现实生活中的问题来学习。对于不同学术水平的学生如何感知PBL方法的有效性,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在比较和分析学生对在不同本科和研究生阶段土木工程课程中使用PBL的看法。通过学期末发放的问卷,收集了学生对在土木工程课程中部分使用PBL来提高他们对课程主题的理解和发展他们的生活技能的有效性的看法。数据收集自104名就读于5门不同土木工程本科和研究生课程的学生。结果显示,初级课程的学生比高级课程和研究生课程的学生对协作和团队合作的态度更积极。与团队合作、协作和沟通技巧相关的调查问题的平均得分随课程水平的增加而降低。低年级学生对小组合作中快乐程度的满意度最高。由于会议安排困难,研究生们注意到沟通无效。在与团队合作/协作技能和团队合作时的享受程度有关的调查问题中,他们的平均得分最低。然而,调查结果显示,PBL在提高研究生对课程主题的理解、自我调节和自我学习技能方面比本科生更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student perceptions of the use of project-based learning in civil engineering courses
Project-based learning (PBL) is a student-centered approach in which students learn by solving real-life problems in a teamwork environment. Little is known about how students in different academic levels perceive the effectiveness of PBL approach. This study aims to compare and analyze students' perceptions of the use of PBL in different undergraduate- and graduate-level civil engineering courses. Students' perceptions of the effectiveness of the partial use of PBL in civil engineering courses to improve their understanding of course topics and develop their life skills were collected through a questionnaire distributed at the end of the semester. Data was collected from 104 students enrolled in five different undergraduate and graduate civil engineering courses. Results showed that students of the junior-level course held more positive attitude towards collaboration and teamwork rather than students of senior-level or graduate-level courses. The mean scores of the survey questions related to teamwork, collaboration, and communication skills tended to decrease with an increase in the course level. Junior-level students exhibited the highest degree of satisfaction in response to the survey question related to the degree of enjoyment when working in groups. Due to the difficulty in scheduling meetings, ineffective communications were noted by graduate students. They recorded the lowest mean scores for the survey questions related to teamwork/collaboration skills and degree of enjoyment when working in groups. Survey results indicated, however, that PBL was more effective in improving understanding of course topics, self-regulation and self-learning skills of the graduate students rather than undergraduate students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信