使用测试流程图的基于规范的测试方法

Ryan Voigt, Kareem Fazal, H. Reza
{"title":"使用测试流程图的基于规范的测试方法","authors":"Ryan Voigt, Kareem Fazal, H. Reza","doi":"10.1109/ICSEA.2007.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the most formalizable UML diagram, statecharts make a natural basis for specification based test generation. In this paper we discuss a specification-based testing method that extends specification-based testing method known as Testing Flow Graphs (TFG). Our extended TFG method allows test sequences to be generated that also meet full predicate coverage. To show the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach relative to the original work, we carried out an empirical evaluation using mutation analysis.","PeriodicalId":395851,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2007)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specification-based Testing Method Using Testing Flow Graphs\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Voigt, Kareem Fazal, H. Reza\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSEA.2007.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the most formalizable UML diagram, statecharts make a natural basis for specification based test generation. In this paper we discuss a specification-based testing method that extends specification-based testing method known as Testing Flow Graphs (TFG). Our extended TFG method allows test sequences to be generated that also meet full predicate coverage. To show the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach relative to the original work, we carried out an empirical evaluation using mutation analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":395851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2007)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEA.2007.65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEA.2007.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

作为最可形式化的UML图,状态图为基于规范的测试生成提供了自然的基础。在本文中,我们讨论了一种基于规范的测试方法,它扩展了基于规范的测试方法,即测试流程图(TFG)。我们扩展的TFG方法允许生成满足完全谓词覆盖的测试序列。为了证明我们的方法相对于原始工作的有效性和效率,我们使用突变分析进行了实证评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Specification-based Testing Method Using Testing Flow Graphs
As the most formalizable UML diagram, statecharts make a natural basis for specification based test generation. In this paper we discuss a specification-based testing method that extends specification-based testing method known as Testing Flow Graphs (TFG). Our extended TFG method allows test sequences to be generated that also meet full predicate coverage. To show the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach relative to the original work, we carried out an empirical evaluation using mutation analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信