{"title":"在一个自由选择的任务中对位置的重新检查","authors":"K. Mizuhara, Hiroyuki Muto, H. Nittono","doi":"10.5265/JCOGPSY.16.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People o en misperceive the timing of when they made a decision. Bear & Bloom (2016) asked participants to choose one white circle from a selection of ve white circles and to continue watching them until a predetermined target circle changed to red, and then report whether it was their chosen circle that had changed color. e participants tended to report having chosen the target circle under a quick-change condition, which indicates that, although choices were a ected by the change, people perceive having made their choice prior to the change. As new evidence supporting the postdiction of decision-making timings, the present study reports a similar e ect for delays of 25–50 ms, but not for 17 ms. Moreover, the propensity for participants to report having chosen any circle by a deadline was observed to be greater at delays of 167 ms or less, which indicates that awareness of decision-making is postdictive in nature when delays are short.","PeriodicalId":237139,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese journal of cognitive psychology","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A reexamination of postdiction within a free-choice task\",\"authors\":\"K. Mizuhara, Hiroyuki Muto, H. Nittono\",\"doi\":\"10.5265/JCOGPSY.16.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"People o en misperceive the timing of when they made a decision. Bear & Bloom (2016) asked participants to choose one white circle from a selection of ve white circles and to continue watching them until a predetermined target circle changed to red, and then report whether it was their chosen circle that had changed color. e participants tended to report having chosen the target circle under a quick-change condition, which indicates that, although choices were a ected by the change, people perceive having made their choice prior to the change. As new evidence supporting the postdiction of decision-making timings, the present study reports a similar e ect for delays of 25–50 ms, but not for 17 ms. Moreover, the propensity for participants to report having chosen any circle by a deadline was observed to be greater at delays of 167 ms or less, which indicates that awareness of decision-making is postdictive in nature when delays are short.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Japanese journal of cognitive psychology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Japanese journal of cognitive psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5265/JCOGPSY.16.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese journal of cognitive psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5265/JCOGPSY.16.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A reexamination of postdiction within a free-choice task
People o en misperceive the timing of when they made a decision. Bear & Bloom (2016) asked participants to choose one white circle from a selection of ve white circles and to continue watching them until a predetermined target circle changed to red, and then report whether it was their chosen circle that had changed color. e participants tended to report having chosen the target circle under a quick-change condition, which indicates that, although choices were a ected by the change, people perceive having made their choice prior to the change. As new evidence supporting the postdiction of decision-making timings, the present study reports a similar e ect for delays of 25–50 ms, but not for 17 ms. Moreover, the propensity for participants to report having chosen any circle by a deadline was observed to be greater at delays of 167 ms or less, which indicates that awareness of decision-making is postdictive in nature when delays are short.