ReqsCov:测量测试充分性高于需求的工具

Matthew Staats, Weijia Deng, A. Rajan, M. Heimdahl, Kurt Woodham
{"title":"ReqsCov:测量测试充分性高于需求的工具","authors":"Matthew Staats, Weijia Deng, A. Rajan, M. Heimdahl, Kurt Woodham","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2008.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When creating test cases for software, a common approach is to create tests that exercise requirements. Determining the adequacy of test cases, however, is generally done through inspection or indirectly by measuring structural coverage of an executable artifact (such as source code or a software model). We present ReqsCov, a tool to directly measure requirements coverage provided by test cases. ReqsCov allows users to measure Linear Temporal Logic requirements coverage using three increasingly rigorous requirements coverage metrics: naive coverage, antecedent coverage, and Unique First Cause coverage. By measuring requirements coverage, users are given insight into the quality of test suites beyond what is available when solely using structural coverage metrics over an implementation.","PeriodicalId":184403,"journal":{"name":"2008 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ReqsCov: A Tool for Measuring Test-Adequacy over Requirements\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Staats, Weijia Deng, A. Rajan, M. Heimdahl, Kurt Woodham\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASE.2008.90\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When creating test cases for software, a common approach is to create tests that exercise requirements. Determining the adequacy of test cases, however, is generally done through inspection or indirectly by measuring structural coverage of an executable artifact (such as source code or a software model). We present ReqsCov, a tool to directly measure requirements coverage provided by test cases. ReqsCov allows users to measure Linear Temporal Logic requirements coverage using three increasingly rigorous requirements coverage metrics: naive coverage, antecedent coverage, and Unique First Cause coverage. By measuring requirements coverage, users are given insight into the quality of test suites beyond what is available when solely using structural coverage metrics over an implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2008.90\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2008.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在为软件创建测试用例时,常见的方法是创建执行需求的测试。然而,确定测试用例的充分性通常是通过检查或间接地通过测量可执行工件(如源代码或软件模型)的结构覆盖来完成的。我们提出ReqsCov,一个直接测量由测试用例提供的需求覆盖率的工具。ReqsCov允许用户使用三个日益严格的需求覆盖度量来度量线性时序逻辑需求覆盖:初始覆盖、先行覆盖和唯一的第一原因覆盖。通过测量需求覆盖率,用户可以深入了解测试套件的质量,而不仅仅是在实现上单独使用结构覆盖率度量时可用的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ReqsCov: A Tool for Measuring Test-Adequacy over Requirements
When creating test cases for software, a common approach is to create tests that exercise requirements. Determining the adequacy of test cases, however, is generally done through inspection or indirectly by measuring structural coverage of an executable artifact (such as source code or a software model). We present ReqsCov, a tool to directly measure requirements coverage provided by test cases. ReqsCov allows users to measure Linear Temporal Logic requirements coverage using three increasingly rigorous requirements coverage metrics: naive coverage, antecedent coverage, and Unique First Cause coverage. By measuring requirements coverage, users are given insight into the quality of test suites beyond what is available when solely using structural coverage metrics over an implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信