基于风险的测试评估

Yasser Ghanim
{"title":"基于风险的测试评估","authors":"Yasser Ghanim","doi":"10.1145/3178298.3178302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Test Estimation is a problematic area. Two main approaches were followed traditionally to estimate testing effort. Development Ratio method with testing effort as a fixed percentage of the development effort, and independent estimation techniques of the test requirements or WBS. Both approaches often apply adjustment factors to the resulting effort to reflect different technical and environmental parameters in order to increase estimation accuracy. However the old approaches share a common pitfall; the absence of direct correlation between the estimated effort and the criticality of the system under test in its operational context (risk of failure). Critical or sensitive test objects require more attention than the less critical or the more stable ones. The effort spent by testers on every test object got to be function of the risk the end users might incur should this object fail. This paper is an industry report based on practical experience that aims at combining the benefits of the traditional approaches with consideration of product risks. It provides a method that draws a product risk profile and devises a risk-based effort calculation formula and metrics scheme where effort is proportionate to the risk level of each object under test.","PeriodicalId":247467,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd Africa and Middle East Conference on Software Engineering","volume":"397 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk-Based Test Estimation\",\"authors\":\"Yasser Ghanim\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3178298.3178302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Test Estimation is a problematic area. Two main approaches were followed traditionally to estimate testing effort. Development Ratio method with testing effort as a fixed percentage of the development effort, and independent estimation techniques of the test requirements or WBS. Both approaches often apply adjustment factors to the resulting effort to reflect different technical and environmental parameters in order to increase estimation accuracy. However the old approaches share a common pitfall; the absence of direct correlation between the estimated effort and the criticality of the system under test in its operational context (risk of failure). Critical or sensitive test objects require more attention than the less critical or the more stable ones. The effort spent by testers on every test object got to be function of the risk the end users might incur should this object fail. This paper is an industry report based on practical experience that aims at combining the benefits of the traditional approaches with consideration of product risks. It provides a method that draws a product risk profile and devises a risk-based effort calculation formula and metrics scheme where effort is proportionate to the risk level of each object under test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd Africa and Middle East Conference on Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"397 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd Africa and Middle East Conference on Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3178298.3178302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd Africa and Middle East Conference on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3178298.3178302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

测试评估是一个有问题的领域。传统上有两种主要的方法来评估测试工作。将测试工作作为开发工作的固定百分比的开发比率方法,以及测试需求或WBS的独立估计技术。这两种方法通常对结果工作应用调整因素,以反映不同的技术和环境参数,以提高估计的准确性。然而,旧的方法有一个共同的陷阱;在其运行环境(失败的风险)中,在估计的工作量和被测系统的临界性之间缺乏直接的相关性。关键或敏感的测试对象比不那么关键或更稳定的测试对象需要更多的关注。测试人员在每个测试对象上花费的精力必须是最终用户在该对象失败时可能产生的风险的函数。本文是一份基于实践经验的行业报告,旨在将传统方法的优点与考虑产品风险相结合。它提供了一种绘制产品风险概况的方法,并设计了一个基于风险的工作量计算公式和度量方案,其中工作量与每个测试对象的风险水平成比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk-Based Test Estimation
Test Estimation is a problematic area. Two main approaches were followed traditionally to estimate testing effort. Development Ratio method with testing effort as a fixed percentage of the development effort, and independent estimation techniques of the test requirements or WBS. Both approaches often apply adjustment factors to the resulting effort to reflect different technical and environmental parameters in order to increase estimation accuracy. However the old approaches share a common pitfall; the absence of direct correlation between the estimated effort and the criticality of the system under test in its operational context (risk of failure). Critical or sensitive test objects require more attention than the less critical or the more stable ones. The effort spent by testers on every test object got to be function of the risk the end users might incur should this object fail. This paper is an industry report based on practical experience that aims at combining the benefits of the traditional approaches with consideration of product risks. It provides a method that draws a product risk profile and devises a risk-based effort calculation formula and metrics scheme where effort is proportionate to the risk level of each object under test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信