Java程序的有效增量检查点

J. Lawall, Gilles Muller
{"title":"Java程序的有效增量检查点","authors":"J. Lawall, Gilles Muller","doi":"10.1109/ICDSN.2000.857515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the optimization of language-level checkpointing of Java programs. First, we describe how to systematically associate incremental checkpoints with Java classes. While being safe, the genericness of this solution induces substantial execution overhead. Second, to solve the dilemma of genericness versus performance, we use automatic program specialization to transform the generic checkpointing methods into highly optimized ones. Specialization exploits two kinds of information: structural properties about the program classes; knowledge of unmodified data structures in specific program phases. The latter information allows us to generate phase-specific checkpointing methods. We evaluate our approach on two benchmarks, a realistic application which consists of a program analysis engine, and a synthetic program which can serve as a metric. Specialization gives a speedup proportional to the complexity of the object structure and the modification pattern. Measured speedups for the program analysis engine are up to 1.5, and for the synthetic program are up to 15.","PeriodicalId":127372,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. DSN 2000","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient incremental checkpointing of Java programs\",\"authors\":\"J. Lawall, Gilles Muller\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDSN.2000.857515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate the optimization of language-level checkpointing of Java programs. First, we describe how to systematically associate incremental checkpoints with Java classes. While being safe, the genericness of this solution induces substantial execution overhead. Second, to solve the dilemma of genericness versus performance, we use automatic program specialization to transform the generic checkpointing methods into highly optimized ones. Specialization exploits two kinds of information: structural properties about the program classes; knowledge of unmodified data structures in specific program phases. The latter information allows us to generate phase-specific checkpointing methods. We evaluate our approach on two benchmarks, a realistic application which consists of a program analysis engine, and a synthetic program which can serve as a metric. Specialization gives a speedup proportional to the complexity of the object structure and the modification pattern. Measured speedups for the program analysis engine are up to 1.5, and for the synthetic program are up to 15.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceeding International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. DSN 2000\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceeding International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. DSN 2000\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSN.2000.857515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. DSN 2000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSN.2000.857515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

我们研究了Java程序的语言级检查点的优化。首先,我们描述如何系统地将增量检查点与Java类关联起来。虽然安全,但这种解决方案的通用性导致了大量的执行开销。其次,为了解决泛型与性能的矛盾,我们使用自动程序专门化将泛型检查点方法转换为高度优化的检查点方法。专门化利用两种信息:关于程序类的结构属性;了解特定程序阶段未修改的数据结构。后一种信息允许我们生成特定阶段的检查点方法。我们在两个基准上评估我们的方法,一个是由程序分析引擎组成的现实应用程序,一个是可以作为度量标准的合成程序。专门化提供了与对象结构和修改模式的复杂性成正比的加速。程序分析引擎的测量加速高达1.5,而合成程序的加速高达15。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficient incremental checkpointing of Java programs
We investigate the optimization of language-level checkpointing of Java programs. First, we describe how to systematically associate incremental checkpoints with Java classes. While being safe, the genericness of this solution induces substantial execution overhead. Second, to solve the dilemma of genericness versus performance, we use automatic program specialization to transform the generic checkpointing methods into highly optimized ones. Specialization exploits two kinds of information: structural properties about the program classes; knowledge of unmodified data structures in specific program phases. The latter information allows us to generate phase-specific checkpointing methods. We evaluate our approach on two benchmarks, a realistic application which consists of a program analysis engine, and a synthetic program which can serve as a metric. Specialization gives a speedup proportional to the complexity of the object structure and the modification pattern. Measured speedups for the program analysis engine are up to 1.5, and for the synthetic program are up to 15.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信