{"title":"HCI作为社会政策:道德设计中的数字权利视角","authors":"R. Calvo, Dorian Peters, J. Huppert, G. Goggin","doi":"10.1145/3292147.3292162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By mediating activity, technology can empower or limit people's lives. This raises a number of ethical challenges for technology designers since their work directly touches on what people consider their 'rights' and their needs for a good life. In this article, we summarise a number of philosophical perspectives that stand to inform our understanding of design for digital rights. These foreground discussion of the Digital Rights in Australia Report, a study of Australians' views (N=1603) on a number of critical rights including privacy, free speech, workplace technologies and government surveillance. The data is analysed from a rights perspective, considering and moving beyond classic negative and positive rights accounts. We conclude with a discussion of how such studies could inform HCI research and practice.","PeriodicalId":309502,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HCI as social policy: perspectives on digital rights in ethical design\",\"authors\":\"R. Calvo, Dorian Peters, J. Huppert, G. Goggin\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3292147.3292162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By mediating activity, technology can empower or limit people's lives. This raises a number of ethical challenges for technology designers since their work directly touches on what people consider their 'rights' and their needs for a good life. In this article, we summarise a number of philosophical perspectives that stand to inform our understanding of design for digital rights. These foreground discussion of the Digital Rights in Australia Report, a study of Australians' views (N=1603) on a number of critical rights including privacy, free speech, workplace technologies and government surveillance. The data is analysed from a rights perspective, considering and moving beyond classic negative and positive rights accounts. We conclude with a discussion of how such studies could inform HCI research and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3292147.3292162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
HCI as social policy: perspectives on digital rights in ethical design
By mediating activity, technology can empower or limit people's lives. This raises a number of ethical challenges for technology designers since their work directly touches on what people consider their 'rights' and their needs for a good life. In this article, we summarise a number of philosophical perspectives that stand to inform our understanding of design for digital rights. These foreground discussion of the Digital Rights in Australia Report, a study of Australians' views (N=1603) on a number of critical rights including privacy, free speech, workplace technologies and government surveillance. The data is analysed from a rights perspective, considering and moving beyond classic negative and positive rights accounts. We conclude with a discussion of how such studies could inform HCI research and practice.