前言及致谢

{"title":"前言及致谢","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9780804780520-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many of the ideas that form the basis of this book were first conceived for my doctoral dissertation, “Chastity, Heroism, and Allure: Women in the Opera of Seventeenth-Century Venice” (Brandeis University, 1995). The early nineties were an extraordinary time to be undertaking such a study. I was among a small group of scholars reconsidering opera in the context of gender studies. There was a flurry of publications on gender in the early modern period, and scholars in a variety of disciplines were reconsidering the complex relationships between artworks and the societies that produced them, providing new models for intellectual inquiry. I was profoundly influenced and encouraged by the pioneering work done on Monteverdi and gender by Susan McClary, and my work has benefited in numerous ways from the influence and support of a number of scholars working on gender in opera or early modern music: Tim Carter, Suzanne Cusick, Beth Glixon, Lydia Hammesley, and Mary Ann Smart, to name but a few. I was also fortunate to have begun this study during what was certainly a “renaissance” in the study of seventeenth-century music. The first annual meeting of the Society for Seventeenth-Century Music was held in St. Louis in spring of 1992, providing many younger scholars with a wonderfully supportive and generous community. Perhaps most important, I had the privilege of writing after the publication of two extraordinarily influential books. Ellen Rosand’s monumental Opera in Seventeenth-Century Venice became a bible for all of us working on Venetian opera studies, and Eric Chafe’s Monteverdi’s Tonal Language gave us many new tools with which to analyze seventeenth-century music. The transformation of the dissertation into this book has been a far more complex and rewarding process than I would ever have imagined, and the result is a work that only superficially resembles the original. The change in title is not insignificant, as the book addresses issues that were only implicit","PeriodicalId":413601,"journal":{"name":"Varieties of Feminism","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preface and Acknowledgments\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9780804780520-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many of the ideas that form the basis of this book were first conceived for my doctoral dissertation, “Chastity, Heroism, and Allure: Women in the Opera of Seventeenth-Century Venice” (Brandeis University, 1995). The early nineties were an extraordinary time to be undertaking such a study. I was among a small group of scholars reconsidering opera in the context of gender studies. There was a flurry of publications on gender in the early modern period, and scholars in a variety of disciplines were reconsidering the complex relationships between artworks and the societies that produced them, providing new models for intellectual inquiry. I was profoundly influenced and encouraged by the pioneering work done on Monteverdi and gender by Susan McClary, and my work has benefited in numerous ways from the influence and support of a number of scholars working on gender in opera or early modern music: Tim Carter, Suzanne Cusick, Beth Glixon, Lydia Hammesley, and Mary Ann Smart, to name but a few. I was also fortunate to have begun this study during what was certainly a “renaissance” in the study of seventeenth-century music. The first annual meeting of the Society for Seventeenth-Century Music was held in St. Louis in spring of 1992, providing many younger scholars with a wonderfully supportive and generous community. Perhaps most important, I had the privilege of writing after the publication of two extraordinarily influential books. Ellen Rosand’s monumental Opera in Seventeenth-Century Venice became a bible for all of us working on Venetian opera studies, and Eric Chafe’s Monteverdi’s Tonal Language gave us many new tools with which to analyze seventeenth-century music. The transformation of the dissertation into this book has been a far more complex and rewarding process than I would ever have imagined, and the result is a work that only superficially resembles the original. The change in title is not insignificant, as the book addresses issues that were only implicit\",\"PeriodicalId\":413601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Varieties of Feminism\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Varieties of Feminism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804780520-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Varieties of Feminism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804780520-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

构成本书基础的许多观点最初是在我的博士论文《贞洁、英雄主义和诱惑:17世纪威尼斯歌剧中的女性》(布兰代斯大学,1995年)中构思出来的。九十年代初是进行这样一项研究的非凡时期。我是在性别研究背景下重新考虑歌剧的一小群学者之一。在现代早期,出现了大量关于性别的出版物,各个学科的学者都在重新思考艺术品与生产它们的社会之间的复杂关系,为智力探索提供了新的模式。我深受苏珊·麦克拉里对蒙特威尔第和性别的开创性研究的影响和鼓舞,我的工作在很多方面都受益于许多研究歌剧或早期现代音乐中性别的学者的影响和支持:蒂姆·卡特、苏珊娜·库西克、贝丝·格里格森、莉迪亚·哈梅斯利和玛丽·安·斯玛特,仅举几例。我也很幸运能在十七世纪音乐研究的“复兴”时期开始这项研究。十七世纪音乐协会的第一届年会于1992年春天在圣路易斯举行,为许多年轻的学者提供了一个非常支持和慷慨的社区。也许最重要的是,我有幸在出版了两本极具影响力的书之后开始写作。艾伦·罗桑在17世纪威尼斯的不朽歌剧成为我们所有研究威尼斯歌剧的人的圣经,埃里克·查菲的《蒙特威尔第的调性语言》给了我们许多分析17世纪音乐的新工具。把论文变成这本书的过程比我想象的要复杂得多,也比我想象的要有意义得多,结果是,这本书只在表面上与原著相似。标题的变化并非无关紧要,因为这本书只涉及隐含的问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preface and Acknowledgments
Many of the ideas that form the basis of this book were first conceived for my doctoral dissertation, “Chastity, Heroism, and Allure: Women in the Opera of Seventeenth-Century Venice” (Brandeis University, 1995). The early nineties were an extraordinary time to be undertaking such a study. I was among a small group of scholars reconsidering opera in the context of gender studies. There was a flurry of publications on gender in the early modern period, and scholars in a variety of disciplines were reconsidering the complex relationships between artworks and the societies that produced them, providing new models for intellectual inquiry. I was profoundly influenced and encouraged by the pioneering work done on Monteverdi and gender by Susan McClary, and my work has benefited in numerous ways from the influence and support of a number of scholars working on gender in opera or early modern music: Tim Carter, Suzanne Cusick, Beth Glixon, Lydia Hammesley, and Mary Ann Smart, to name but a few. I was also fortunate to have begun this study during what was certainly a “renaissance” in the study of seventeenth-century music. The first annual meeting of the Society for Seventeenth-Century Music was held in St. Louis in spring of 1992, providing many younger scholars with a wonderfully supportive and generous community. Perhaps most important, I had the privilege of writing after the publication of two extraordinarily influential books. Ellen Rosand’s monumental Opera in Seventeenth-Century Venice became a bible for all of us working on Venetian opera studies, and Eric Chafe’s Monteverdi’s Tonal Language gave us many new tools with which to analyze seventeenth-century music. The transformation of the dissertation into this book has been a far more complex and rewarding process than I would ever have imagined, and the result is a work that only superficially resembles the original. The change in title is not insignificant, as the book addresses issues that were only implicit
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信