用层次复杂性模型分析韦氏成人智力量表第四版(WAIS-IV)的语言理解指数:为什么阶段比语言智商更能衡量“聪明”?

K. Featherston, S. Chen, Maria Toth-Gauthier, J. Day, Philippe Herman, Raquel Laverdeur, L. Nicolaï, Anne-Catherine Nicolay, A. Sini, C. Tilkin, Mireille Tyberghein, Christian Vanheck
{"title":"用层次复杂性模型分析韦氏成人智力量表第四版(WAIS-IV)的语言理解指数:为什么阶段比语言智商更能衡量“聪明”?","authors":"K. Featherston, S. Chen, Maria Toth-Gauthier, J. Day, Philippe Herman, Raquel Laverdeur, L. Nicolaï, Anne-Catherine Nicolay, A. Sini, C. Tilkin, Mireille Tyberghein, Christian Vanheck","doi":"10.1037/BDB0000015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While IQ tests are the most common and largely accepted measurement of how “smart” a person is, whether they are the best measure of this construct is up for debate. This paper will discuss the relationship between IQ tests and their corresponding order of hierarchical complexity developmental stage scores based on the model of hierarchical complexity (MHC). The Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) scales of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition (WAIS–IV) were used for scoring. The study shows that, according to the Hierarchical Complexity Scoring System (HCSS), the WAIS–IV fails to test verbal intelligence beyond the formal stage. This study used Rasch analysis to demonstrate that scoring the VCI of the WAIS–IV from a developmental sequence using the HCSS was successful in explaining the majority of the difficulty in VCI items. Much of the additional difficulty of tasks came from the knowledge of rare items and noise. This demonstrates the ceiling effect of the VCI of the WAIS–IV. Difficulties with scoring items, additional limitations with the IQ test, and their implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":314223,"journal":{"name":"The Behavioral Development Bulletin","volume":"393 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of the Verbal Comprehension Index of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition (WAIS–IV) using the Model of Hierarchical Complexity (MHC): Why might stage be a better measure of “smarts” than verbal IQ?\",\"authors\":\"K. Featherston, S. Chen, Maria Toth-Gauthier, J. Day, Philippe Herman, Raquel Laverdeur, L. Nicolaï, Anne-Catherine Nicolay, A. Sini, C. Tilkin, Mireille Tyberghein, Christian Vanheck\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/BDB0000015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While IQ tests are the most common and largely accepted measurement of how “smart” a person is, whether they are the best measure of this construct is up for debate. This paper will discuss the relationship between IQ tests and their corresponding order of hierarchical complexity developmental stage scores based on the model of hierarchical complexity (MHC). The Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) scales of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition (WAIS–IV) were used for scoring. The study shows that, according to the Hierarchical Complexity Scoring System (HCSS), the WAIS–IV fails to test verbal intelligence beyond the formal stage. This study used Rasch analysis to demonstrate that scoring the VCI of the WAIS–IV from a developmental sequence using the HCSS was successful in explaining the majority of the difficulty in VCI items. Much of the additional difficulty of tasks came from the knowledge of rare items and noise. This demonstrates the ceiling effect of the VCI of the WAIS–IV. Difficulties with scoring items, additional limitations with the IQ test, and their implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Behavioral Development Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"393 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Behavioral Development Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/BDB0000015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Behavioral Development Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/BDB0000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

虽然智商测试是衡量一个人有多“聪明”的最常见、最被广泛接受的方法,但它们是否是衡量这种结构的最佳方法仍存在争议。本文将基于层次复杂性模型(MHC)探讨智商测试与其相应层次复杂性发展阶段分数顺序之间的关系。采用韦氏成人智力量表第四版(WAIS-IV)的言语理解指数(VCI)量表进行评分。研究表明,根据层次复杂性评分系统(HCSS), WAIS-IV无法测试正式阶段以外的语言智力。本研究使用Rasch分析来证明,使用HCSS从发育序列中对WAIS-IV的VCI进行评分可以成功地解释VCI项目的大部分难度。任务的额外难度大多来自对稀有道具和噪音的了解。这说明了WAIS-IV的VCI的天花板效应。讨论了评分项目的困难,智商测试的附加限制及其含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An analysis of the Verbal Comprehension Index of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition (WAIS–IV) using the Model of Hierarchical Complexity (MHC): Why might stage be a better measure of “smarts” than verbal IQ?
While IQ tests are the most common and largely accepted measurement of how “smart” a person is, whether they are the best measure of this construct is up for debate. This paper will discuss the relationship between IQ tests and their corresponding order of hierarchical complexity developmental stage scores based on the model of hierarchical complexity (MHC). The Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI) scales of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition (WAIS–IV) were used for scoring. The study shows that, according to the Hierarchical Complexity Scoring System (HCSS), the WAIS–IV fails to test verbal intelligence beyond the formal stage. This study used Rasch analysis to demonstrate that scoring the VCI of the WAIS–IV from a developmental sequence using the HCSS was successful in explaining the majority of the difficulty in VCI items. Much of the additional difficulty of tasks came from the knowledge of rare items and noise. This demonstrates the ceiling effect of the VCI of the WAIS–IV. Difficulties with scoring items, additional limitations with the IQ test, and their implications are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信