自发性冠状动脉夹层经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的病例对照研究

D. Kotecha, A. Premawardhana, M. García-Guimarães, D. Pellegrini, Jan Ziaullah, T. Bastante, A. Wood, A. Maas, R. Geuns, F. Alfonso, D. Adlam
{"title":"自发性冠状动脉夹层经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的病例对照研究","authors":"D. Kotecha, A. Premawardhana, M. García-Guimarães, D. Pellegrini, Jan Ziaullah, T. Bastante, A. Wood, A. Maas, R. Geuns, F. Alfonso, D. Adlam","doi":"10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BCS.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) has emerged as an important cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) particularly in young-middle aged women. The mechanism of coronary obstruction, acute vessel response to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and natural course of conservatively managed lesions differs significantly in SCAD when compared with atherosclerotic ACS. Revascularization is challenging due to an underlying disrupted and friable coronary vessel wall leading to widely reported worse outcomes than for atherosclerotic coronary disease. Therefore, a conservative approach where possible is favoured however in some cases haemodynamic instability, ongoing ischaemia and reduced distal flow mandates consideration of revascularization. Purpose To compare SCAD survivors managed with PCI or conservatively in terms of presentation characteristics, complications and long-term outcomes. Methodology and Results Two hundred and twenty-five angiographically confirmed SCAD survivors (95% female, 47±9.7yrs) who underwent PCI were compared in a case control study with two hundred and twenty-five angiographically confirmed SCAD survivors (92% female, 49±9.9yrs) who were conservatively managed. Patients were recruited from UK, Spanish and Dutch SCAD registries and both groups were well matched in terms of baseline demographics. Those treated with PCI were more likely to present with proximal SCAD (30.8% vs 7.6% P Analysis of all cases reveal complications in 85 (38.8%). SCAD lesion length was associated with presence of complications (P=0.025). However, when assessed for the clinical significance of that complication (defined by a reduction in flow in a proximal/mid vessel, stent extension into left main stem, iatrogenic dissection requiring PCI and CABG as a consequence of PCI), only 26 cases (11.6%) met seriousness criteria with iatrogenic dissection accounting for nearly half (44.6%). There was a non-significant trend towards major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurring more frequently in those undergoing PCI (18 % vs 11% P=0.067) driven by revascularisation (5% vs 1% P=0.036). Median follow up was 2.7 years. Conclusions PCI in SCAD is most often performed in higher risk cases. Whilst overall complication rates were similar to those widely reported, clinically significant complications were uncommon and most interventions in this context were associated with improved angiographic endpoints. Conflict of Interest NA","PeriodicalId":102313,"journal":{"name":"Acute Coronary Syndromes & Interventional Cardiology","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"30 A case control study of percutaneous coronary intervention in spontaneous coronary artery dissection\",\"authors\":\"D. Kotecha, A. Premawardhana, M. García-Guimarães, D. Pellegrini, Jan Ziaullah, T. Bastante, A. Wood, A. Maas, R. Geuns, F. Alfonso, D. Adlam\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BCS.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) has emerged as an important cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) particularly in young-middle aged women. The mechanism of coronary obstruction, acute vessel response to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and natural course of conservatively managed lesions differs significantly in SCAD when compared with atherosclerotic ACS. Revascularization is challenging due to an underlying disrupted and friable coronary vessel wall leading to widely reported worse outcomes than for atherosclerotic coronary disease. Therefore, a conservative approach where possible is favoured however in some cases haemodynamic instability, ongoing ischaemia and reduced distal flow mandates consideration of revascularization. Purpose To compare SCAD survivors managed with PCI or conservatively in terms of presentation characteristics, complications and long-term outcomes. Methodology and Results Two hundred and twenty-five angiographically confirmed SCAD survivors (95% female, 47±9.7yrs) who underwent PCI were compared in a case control study with two hundred and twenty-five angiographically confirmed SCAD survivors (92% female, 49±9.9yrs) who were conservatively managed. Patients were recruited from UK, Spanish and Dutch SCAD registries and both groups were well matched in terms of baseline demographics. Those treated with PCI were more likely to present with proximal SCAD (30.8% vs 7.6% P Analysis of all cases reveal complications in 85 (38.8%). SCAD lesion length was associated with presence of complications (P=0.025). However, when assessed for the clinical significance of that complication (defined by a reduction in flow in a proximal/mid vessel, stent extension into left main stem, iatrogenic dissection requiring PCI and CABG as a consequence of PCI), only 26 cases (11.6%) met seriousness criteria with iatrogenic dissection accounting for nearly half (44.6%). There was a non-significant trend towards major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurring more frequently in those undergoing PCI (18 % vs 11% P=0.067) driven by revascularisation (5% vs 1% P=0.036). Median follow up was 2.7 years. Conclusions PCI in SCAD is most often performed in higher risk cases. Whilst overall complication rates were similar to those widely reported, clinically significant complications were uncommon and most interventions in this context were associated with improved angiographic endpoints. Conflict of Interest NA\",\"PeriodicalId\":102313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Coronary Syndromes & Interventional Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Coronary Syndromes & Interventional Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BCS.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Coronary Syndromes & Interventional Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BCS.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)已成为急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的重要病因,尤其是中青年女性。与动脉粥样硬化性ACS相比,SCAD的冠状动脉阻塞机制、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性血管反应和保守治疗病变的自然过程有显著差异。由于潜在的冠状血管壁破坏和脆弱,导致广泛报道的比动脉粥样硬化性冠状动脉疾病更差的结果,因此血运重建具有挑战性。因此,在可能的情况下,保守方法是可取的,但在某些情况下,血流动力学不稳定,持续的缺血和远端血流减少需要考虑血运重建术。目的比较PCI和保守治疗的SCAD患者的表现特征、并发症和长期预后。方法和结果在一项病例对照研究中,225例经血管造影证实的经PCI治疗的SCAD幸存者(95%为女性,47±9.7岁)与225例经血管造影证实的经保守治疗的SCAD幸存者(92%为女性,49±9.9岁)进行了比较。患者从英国、西班牙和荷兰的SCAD登记处招募,两组在基线人口统计学方面匹配良好。接受PCI治疗的患者更容易出现近端SCAD (30.8% vs 7.6%)。所有病例的分析显示85例(38.8%)出现并发症。SCAD病变长度与并发症的存在相关(P=0.025)。然而,当评估该并发症的临床意义时(定义为近端/中端血管血流减少,支架延伸至左主干,医源性夹层需要PCI和由于PCI导致的CABG),只有26例(11.6%)符合严重性标准,其中医源性夹层占近一半(44.6%)。在接受PCI的患者中,主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生的频率更高(18% vs 11% P=0.067),这一趋势不显著(5% vs 1% P=0.036)。中位随访时间为2.7年。结论SCAD的PCI多见于高危患者。虽然总体并发症发生率与广泛报道的相似,但临床上显著的并发症并不常见,而且在这种情况下,大多数干预措施都与改善的血管造影终点相关。利益冲突NA
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
30 A case control study of percutaneous coronary intervention in spontaneous coronary artery dissection
Background Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) has emerged as an important cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) particularly in young-middle aged women. The mechanism of coronary obstruction, acute vessel response to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and natural course of conservatively managed lesions differs significantly in SCAD when compared with atherosclerotic ACS. Revascularization is challenging due to an underlying disrupted and friable coronary vessel wall leading to widely reported worse outcomes than for atherosclerotic coronary disease. Therefore, a conservative approach where possible is favoured however in some cases haemodynamic instability, ongoing ischaemia and reduced distal flow mandates consideration of revascularization. Purpose To compare SCAD survivors managed with PCI or conservatively in terms of presentation characteristics, complications and long-term outcomes. Methodology and Results Two hundred and twenty-five angiographically confirmed SCAD survivors (95% female, 47±9.7yrs) who underwent PCI were compared in a case control study with two hundred and twenty-five angiographically confirmed SCAD survivors (92% female, 49±9.9yrs) who were conservatively managed. Patients were recruited from UK, Spanish and Dutch SCAD registries and both groups were well matched in terms of baseline demographics. Those treated with PCI were more likely to present with proximal SCAD (30.8% vs 7.6% P Analysis of all cases reveal complications in 85 (38.8%). SCAD lesion length was associated with presence of complications (P=0.025). However, when assessed for the clinical significance of that complication (defined by a reduction in flow in a proximal/mid vessel, stent extension into left main stem, iatrogenic dissection requiring PCI and CABG as a consequence of PCI), only 26 cases (11.6%) met seriousness criteria with iatrogenic dissection accounting for nearly half (44.6%). There was a non-significant trend towards major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurring more frequently in those undergoing PCI (18 % vs 11% P=0.067) driven by revascularisation (5% vs 1% P=0.036). Median follow up was 2.7 years. Conclusions PCI in SCAD is most often performed in higher risk cases. Whilst overall complication rates were similar to those widely reported, clinically significant complications were uncommon and most interventions in this context were associated with improved angiographic endpoints. Conflict of Interest NA
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信