{"title":"An in vitro Study to Compare the Accuracy of Master Cast Fabricated by Three Different Transfer Techniques for Single Tooth Implant Replacement using Open and Close Tray","authors":"Rahul Nagrath, Manesh Lahori, Yatharth Bhatia, Anubhav Srivastav","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10012-1143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Success in oral rehabilitation with dental implants can be attributed to precise surgical and prosthodontics techniques. The long-term success rate of osseointegrated implants has made implant supported prostheses the treatment option of choice for the treatment of missing teeth. With the predictable integration of implants, the emphasis is shifted toward precise prosthesis. An acceptable prostheses requires optimal accuracy in all steps of fabrication. Therefore, present study was undertaken to measure the accuracy between the resin model simulating the clinical situation of a maxillary posterior single-tooth implant and 12 groups of master casts fabricated by 3 different transfer impression techniques using polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) and polyether impression material with customized open and closed trays. Master casts fabricated for all the groups were analyzed with the help of profile projector to detect rotational position change of the hexagon on the implant replicas in the master casts in comparison to the resin model. The master cast using open tray technique with sandblasted coping using polyether material showed the minimum deviation and least rotational movement in the position of hexagon head of implant. Hence, the clinician should use sandblasted impression copings with polyether impression material to achieve a more accurate and precise orientation of the implant replicas on laboratory master casts for single-tooth implant restorations. How to cite this article: Lahori M, Nagrath R, Bhatia Y, Srivastav A. An in vitro Study to Compare the Accuracy of Master Cast Fabricated by Three Different Transfer Techniques for Single Tooth Implant Replacement using Open and Close Tray. Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res 2015;6(3):85-93. Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None","PeriodicalId":303737,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10012-1143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
牙科种植体在口腔康复中的成功可归功于精确的外科和修复技术。骨结合种植体的长期成功率使得种植体支撑式种植体成为治疗缺牙的首选治疗方法。随着植入物的可预测整合,重点转向精确的假体。一个可接受的假体需要在制造的所有步骤中达到最佳精度。因此,本研究采用树脂模型模拟上颌后牙单牙种植体的临床情况,并采用3种不同的转移模印技术,采用聚乙烯硅氧烷(PVS)和聚醚模印材料制作12组主模模,采用定制的开放和封闭托盘,测量其准确性。在轮廓投影仪的帮助下,对所有组的主铸型进行分析,以检测与树脂模型相比,主铸型中植入复制品的六边形旋转位置的变化。用聚醚材料喷砂复盖的开盘铸造主模在种植体六边形头部位置的偏移最小,旋转运动最小。因此,临床医生应该使用喷砂印模和聚醚印模材料,在实验室主模上实现更准确和精确的种植体复制品定位,用于单牙种植体修复。Lahori M, Nagrath R, Bhatia Y, Srivastav A.三种不同转移技术制备的主铸造体在开闭牙种植体置换术中的体外研究。国际口腔医学杂志,2015;6(3):85-93。支持来源:无利益冲突:无
An in vitro Study to Compare the Accuracy of Master Cast Fabricated by Three Different Transfer Techniques for Single Tooth Implant Replacement using Open and Close Tray
Success in oral rehabilitation with dental implants can be attributed to precise surgical and prosthodontics techniques. The long-term success rate of osseointegrated implants has made implant supported prostheses the treatment option of choice for the treatment of missing teeth. With the predictable integration of implants, the emphasis is shifted toward precise prosthesis. An acceptable prostheses requires optimal accuracy in all steps of fabrication. Therefore, present study was undertaken to measure the accuracy between the resin model simulating the clinical situation of a maxillary posterior single-tooth implant and 12 groups of master casts fabricated by 3 different transfer impression techniques using polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) and polyether impression material with customized open and closed trays. Master casts fabricated for all the groups were analyzed with the help of profile projector to detect rotational position change of the hexagon on the implant replicas in the master casts in comparison to the resin model. The master cast using open tray technique with sandblasted coping using polyether material showed the minimum deviation and least rotational movement in the position of hexagon head of implant. Hence, the clinician should use sandblasted impression copings with polyether impression material to achieve a more accurate and precise orientation of the implant replicas on laboratory master casts for single-tooth implant restorations. How to cite this article: Lahori M, Nagrath R, Bhatia Y, Srivastav A. An in vitro Study to Compare the Accuracy of Master Cast Fabricated by Three Different Transfer Techniques for Single Tooth Implant Replacement using Open and Close Tray. Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res 2015;6(3):85-93. Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None