重新认识丹麦学校民主健康教育的障碍:制度基础的分析

Dina Danielsen, M. Bruselius-Jensen, Dan Laitsch
{"title":"重新认识丹麦学校民主健康教育的障碍:制度基础的分析","authors":"Dina Danielsen, M. Bruselius-Jensen, Dan Laitsch","doi":"10.1080/18377122.2016.1277546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Health promotion and education researchers and practitioners advocate for more democratic approaches to school-based health education, including participatory teaching methods and the promotion of a broad and positive concept of health and health knowledge, including aspects of the German educational concept of bildung. Although Denmark, from where the data of this article are derived, has instituted policies for such approaches, their implementation in practice faces challenges. Adopting a symbolic interactionist analytical framework this paper explores and defines two powerful institutional rationales connected to formal and informal social processes and institutional purposes of schools, namely conservatism and Neoliberalism. It is empirically described and argued how these institutional rationales discourage teachers and students from including a broad and positive concept of health, the element of participation, and the promotion of general knowledge as legitimate elements in health education. This paper thus contains a perspective on health education practice, which, in a new way, contributes to explain the relatively slow progress of democratic approaches to school health education.","PeriodicalId":125416,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconceiving barriers for democratic health education in Danish schools: an analysis of institutional rationales\",\"authors\":\"Dina Danielsen, M. Bruselius-Jensen, Dan Laitsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18377122.2016.1277546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Health promotion and education researchers and practitioners advocate for more democratic approaches to school-based health education, including participatory teaching methods and the promotion of a broad and positive concept of health and health knowledge, including aspects of the German educational concept of bildung. Although Denmark, from where the data of this article are derived, has instituted policies for such approaches, their implementation in practice faces challenges. Adopting a symbolic interactionist analytical framework this paper explores and defines two powerful institutional rationales connected to formal and informal social processes and institutional purposes of schools, namely conservatism and Neoliberalism. It is empirically described and argued how these institutional rationales discourage teachers and students from including a broad and positive concept of health, the element of participation, and the promotion of general knowledge as legitimate elements in health education. This paper thus contains a perspective on health education practice, which, in a new way, contributes to explain the relatively slow progress of democratic approaches to school health education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2016.1277546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2016.1277546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

健康促进和教育研究人员和从业人员提倡以更民主的方式开展以学校为基础的健康教育,包括参与式教学方法和推广广泛和积极的健康和健康知识概念,包括德国教育理念的各个方面。虽然丹麦(本文数据的来源)已经为这些方法制定了政策,但它们在实践中的执行面临挑战。本文采用象征互动主义的分析框架,探讨并定义了与正式和非正式的社会过程以及学校的制度目的相关的两个强有力的制度基础,即保守主义和新自由主义。本文从经验上描述并论证了这些制度上的理由是如何阻碍教师和学生将广泛和积极的健康概念、参与的要素和促进一般知识作为健康教育的合法要素。因此,本文包含了健康教育实践的视角,以一种新的方式,有助于解释民主方法在学校健康教育中相对缓慢的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconceiving barriers for democratic health education in Danish schools: an analysis of institutional rationales
ABSTRACT Health promotion and education researchers and practitioners advocate for more democratic approaches to school-based health education, including participatory teaching methods and the promotion of a broad and positive concept of health and health knowledge, including aspects of the German educational concept of bildung. Although Denmark, from where the data of this article are derived, has instituted policies for such approaches, their implementation in practice faces challenges. Adopting a symbolic interactionist analytical framework this paper explores and defines two powerful institutional rationales connected to formal and informal social processes and institutional purposes of schools, namely conservatism and Neoliberalism. It is empirically described and argued how these institutional rationales discourage teachers and students from including a broad and positive concept of health, the element of participation, and the promotion of general knowledge as legitimate elements in health education. This paper thus contains a perspective on health education practice, which, in a new way, contributes to explain the relatively slow progress of democratic approaches to school health education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信