J. Dobroch, I. Gronostajska, AK Strosznajder, K. Kubica, I. Lenartowicz, G. Naronowicz, P. Knapp
{"title":"1117新冠肺炎大流行对卵巢癌分期的影响——经认证的晚期卵巢癌手术中心的经验","authors":"J. Dobroch, I. Gronostajska, AK Strosznajder, K. Kubica, I. Lenartowicz, G. Naronowicz, P. Knapp","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2021-esgo.329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Background*COVID-19 pandemic restrictions caused a limitation in healthcare services availability. This could lead to the delay in diagnosis and onset of the treatment. Ovarian cancer (OC) is frequently detected in advanced stage due to its asymptomatic development. The study aimed to determine whether the incidence and staging of OC were influenced by COVID-19 pandemic in the certified advanced ovarian cancer surgery center.MethodologyThe study consisted of 77 patients with primary ovarian cancer admitted to the University Oncology Center in Białystok, Poland between march 2019 and march 2021. We divided patients into two groups, first one diagnosed prior to the pandemic (before march 2020), and the second – diagnosed during pandemic-associated restrictions period. Both groups were compared according to FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) staging and presence of symptoms (hydrothorax and ascites). Statistical analysis was performed with logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance level was set at 0,05.Result(s)*Before the pandemic, 47 patients were admitted with a median age of 61. During the pandemic, there were 30 newly diagnosed patients with a median age of 59. In both groups the most common type of cancer was high grade serous adenocarcinoma (61,7% and 60,0%, respectively). Patients with an advanced OC (FIGO stage III and IV) accounted for 57,4% in the pre-pandemic group, while in the second group patients with advanced cancer accounted for 66,7%. Although the percentage was higher in the second group, the logistic regression analysis did not confirm the impact of pandemic on more frequent occurrence of FIGO III (p=0,17) and IV (p=0,81) diagnosis. Ascites was found in 29,8% of patients before and 30% during pandemic. Hydrothorax was observed in 14,9% of patients in the first group and 26,7% in the second one. Logistic regression analysis revealed no influence of pandemic on percentage of symptomatic patients (p=0,91 for ascites and p=0,18 for hydrothorax).Conclusion*The number of newly diagnosed OC patients was lower during the pandemic than in the preceding year. Without regard to healthcare availability, OC remains the disease which is diagnosed in the advanced stage.","PeriodicalId":253349,"journal":{"name":"Organization of gynaecological cancer care","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1117 Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on staging of ovarian cancer – experience of certified advanced ovarian cancer surgery center\",\"authors\":\"J. Dobroch, I. Gronostajska, AK Strosznajder, K. Kubica, I. Lenartowicz, G. Naronowicz, P. Knapp\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ijgc-2021-esgo.329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction/Background*COVID-19 pandemic restrictions caused a limitation in healthcare services availability. This could lead to the delay in diagnosis and onset of the treatment. Ovarian cancer (OC) is frequently detected in advanced stage due to its asymptomatic development. The study aimed to determine whether the incidence and staging of OC were influenced by COVID-19 pandemic in the certified advanced ovarian cancer surgery center.MethodologyThe study consisted of 77 patients with primary ovarian cancer admitted to the University Oncology Center in Białystok, Poland between march 2019 and march 2021. We divided patients into two groups, first one diagnosed prior to the pandemic (before march 2020), and the second – diagnosed during pandemic-associated restrictions period. Both groups were compared according to FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) staging and presence of symptoms (hydrothorax and ascites). Statistical analysis was performed with logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance level was set at 0,05.Result(s)*Before the pandemic, 47 patients were admitted with a median age of 61. During the pandemic, there were 30 newly diagnosed patients with a median age of 59. In both groups the most common type of cancer was high grade serous adenocarcinoma (61,7% and 60,0%, respectively). Patients with an advanced OC (FIGO stage III and IV) accounted for 57,4% in the pre-pandemic group, while in the second group patients with advanced cancer accounted for 66,7%. Although the percentage was higher in the second group, the logistic regression analysis did not confirm the impact of pandemic on more frequent occurrence of FIGO III (p=0,17) and IV (p=0,81) diagnosis. Ascites was found in 29,8% of patients before and 30% during pandemic. Hydrothorax was observed in 14,9% of patients in the first group and 26,7% in the second one. Logistic regression analysis revealed no influence of pandemic on percentage of symptomatic patients (p=0,91 for ascites and p=0,18 for hydrothorax).Conclusion*The number of newly diagnosed OC patients was lower during the pandemic than in the preceding year. Without regard to healthcare availability, OC remains the disease which is diagnosed in the advanced stage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organization of gynaecological cancer care\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organization of gynaecological cancer care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2021-esgo.329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization of gynaecological cancer care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2021-esgo.329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍/背景*COVID-19大流行的限制措施限制了医疗保健服务的可用性。这可能导致诊断和治疗开始的延迟。卵巢癌(OC)由于其无症状发展而经常在晚期被发现。本研究旨在确定经认证的晚期卵巢癌手术中心的卵巢癌发病率和分期是否受COVID-19大流行的影响。该研究包括2019年3月至2021年3月期间在波兰Białystok大学肿瘤中心收治的77例原发性卵巢癌患者。我们将患者分为两组,第一组是在大流行之前(2020年3月之前)诊断的,第二组是在大流行相关的限制期间诊断的。根据FIGO(国际妇产科联合会)的分期和症状(胸水和腹水)对两组进行比较。采用logistic回归分析进行统计学分析。结果(s)*大流行前,住院患者47例,中位年龄61岁。在大流行期间,有30名新诊断患者,中位年龄为59岁。在两组中,最常见的癌症类型是高级别浆液性腺癌(分别为61.7%和60.5%)。在大流行前组中,晚期癌症患者(FIGO III期和IV期)占57.4%,而在第二组中,晚期癌症患者占66.7%。虽然第二组的百分比较高,但逻辑回归分析并未证实大流行对FIGO III (p= 0.17)和FIGO IV (p= 0.81)诊断的更频繁发生的影响。在大流行前和大流行期间,分别有29.8%和30%的患者出现腹水。第一组有14.9%的患者出现胸水,第二组有26.7%。Logistic回归分析显示,大流行对有症状患者的百分比没有影响(腹水p= 0.91,胸水p= 0.18)。结论:流感大流行期间新诊断的OC患者数量低于前一年。不考虑医疗保健的可用性,卵巢癌仍然是在晚期诊断出来的疾病。
1117 Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on staging of ovarian cancer – experience of certified advanced ovarian cancer surgery center
Introduction/Background*COVID-19 pandemic restrictions caused a limitation in healthcare services availability. This could lead to the delay in diagnosis and onset of the treatment. Ovarian cancer (OC) is frequently detected in advanced stage due to its asymptomatic development. The study aimed to determine whether the incidence and staging of OC were influenced by COVID-19 pandemic in the certified advanced ovarian cancer surgery center.MethodologyThe study consisted of 77 patients with primary ovarian cancer admitted to the University Oncology Center in Białystok, Poland between march 2019 and march 2021. We divided patients into two groups, first one diagnosed prior to the pandemic (before march 2020), and the second – diagnosed during pandemic-associated restrictions period. Both groups were compared according to FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) staging and presence of symptoms (hydrothorax and ascites). Statistical analysis was performed with logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance level was set at 0,05.Result(s)*Before the pandemic, 47 patients were admitted with a median age of 61. During the pandemic, there were 30 newly diagnosed patients with a median age of 59. In both groups the most common type of cancer was high grade serous adenocarcinoma (61,7% and 60,0%, respectively). Patients with an advanced OC (FIGO stage III and IV) accounted for 57,4% in the pre-pandemic group, while in the second group patients with advanced cancer accounted for 66,7%. Although the percentage was higher in the second group, the logistic regression analysis did not confirm the impact of pandemic on more frequent occurrence of FIGO III (p=0,17) and IV (p=0,81) diagnosis. Ascites was found in 29,8% of patients before and 30% during pandemic. Hydrothorax was observed in 14,9% of patients in the first group and 26,7% in the second one. Logistic regression analysis revealed no influence of pandemic on percentage of symptomatic patients (p=0,91 for ascites and p=0,18 for hydrothorax).Conclusion*The number of newly diagnosed OC patients was lower during the pandemic than in the preceding year. Without regard to healthcare availability, OC remains the disease which is diagnosed in the advanced stage.