基于油藏模拟的SAGD和VAPEX方法中最佳井距的确定

M. Bataee, Mahmood Abduljabbar Hebah, Mohsen Shabib-Asl, Z. Hamdi, B. Moradi, S. Ridha
{"title":"基于油藏模拟的SAGD和VAPEX方法中最佳井距的确定","authors":"M. Bataee, Mahmood Abduljabbar Hebah, Mohsen Shabib-Asl, Z. Hamdi, B. Moradi, S. Ridha","doi":"10.2118/212782-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Energy resource extraction is getting more difficult and using the enhanced and advanced level of technology for oil production is getting more common. Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) and Vapor extraction (VAPEX) are two favorable methods of EOR in heavy oil reservoirs. However, there are some obscure points about these methods, like optimum distances between wells and the overall cost of each method. The main objectives of this project were to find the best distance of wells in these types of EOR methods and to enhance the production of heavy oil reservoirs by SAGD and VAPEX methods, taking into consideration of the economic aspects of this project. In this project, SAGD and VAPEX methods were modeled to increase the production rate. Each stage of the Enhance Oil Recovery (EOR) was simulated and modified through many scenarios in terms of the injection patterns, production & injection wells’ locations as well as the adjustment of different injection steam injection and solvent injection. This project analyzed the SAGD method in the shallow reservoir (RF of 69.8%), and in the deep reservoir (RF of 38%). In addition, the maximum allowable depth to apply the SAGD method was found in this study (3500ft). Based on the calculation from the software, it was observed that the heat loss for this reservoir was around 350°F. The cumulative oil production of the SAGD method in the shallow reservoir was 3.87×10^6 bbl and the deep reservoir was2.1×10^6 bbl, and it for the VAPEX method at the shallow reservoir was 2.74×10^6 bbl, and at deep reservoir around 2.64×10^6 bbl, based on the results of each method the VAPEX method remain with the same quality at both reservoirs, however, the SAGD has the lower production in the deep reservoir which means this method is not suitable for the deep reservoir. Furthermore, the profit of each method was calculated; the profit of SAGD and VAPEX were (190.97 MM$ & 168.97 MM$) at the shallow reservoir, and (72.97 MM$ 162.32 MM$) at the deep reservoir for each process. Finally, the spacing between injection and production wells was obtained at different distances and the best distance was 30 m.","PeriodicalId":437231,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, March 15, 2023","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Optimal Distance Between Wells in SAGD and VAPEX Methods Using Reservoir Simulation\",\"authors\":\"M. Bataee, Mahmood Abduljabbar Hebah, Mohsen Shabib-Asl, Z. Hamdi, B. Moradi, S. Ridha\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/212782-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Energy resource extraction is getting more difficult and using the enhanced and advanced level of technology for oil production is getting more common. Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) and Vapor extraction (VAPEX) are two favorable methods of EOR in heavy oil reservoirs. However, there are some obscure points about these methods, like optimum distances between wells and the overall cost of each method. The main objectives of this project were to find the best distance of wells in these types of EOR methods and to enhance the production of heavy oil reservoirs by SAGD and VAPEX methods, taking into consideration of the economic aspects of this project. In this project, SAGD and VAPEX methods were modeled to increase the production rate. Each stage of the Enhance Oil Recovery (EOR) was simulated and modified through many scenarios in terms of the injection patterns, production & injection wells’ locations as well as the adjustment of different injection steam injection and solvent injection. This project analyzed the SAGD method in the shallow reservoir (RF of 69.8%), and in the deep reservoir (RF of 38%). In addition, the maximum allowable depth to apply the SAGD method was found in this study (3500ft). Based on the calculation from the software, it was observed that the heat loss for this reservoir was around 350°F. The cumulative oil production of the SAGD method in the shallow reservoir was 3.87×10^6 bbl and the deep reservoir was2.1×10^6 bbl, and it for the VAPEX method at the shallow reservoir was 2.74×10^6 bbl, and at deep reservoir around 2.64×10^6 bbl, based on the results of each method the VAPEX method remain with the same quality at both reservoirs, however, the SAGD has the lower production in the deep reservoir which means this method is not suitable for the deep reservoir. Furthermore, the profit of each method was calculated; the profit of SAGD and VAPEX were (190.97 MM$ & 168.97 MM$) at the shallow reservoir, and (72.97 MM$ 162.32 MM$) at the deep reservoir for each process. Finally, the spacing between injection and production wells was obtained at different distances and the best distance was 30 m.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 15, 2023\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 15, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/212782-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, March 15, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212782-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源资源的开采难度越来越大,采用先进技术进行石油开采的现象越来越普遍。蒸汽辅助重力泄油(SAGD)和蒸汽萃取(VAPEX)是稠油油藏提高采收率的两种有利方法。然而,这些方法有一些模糊的地方,比如井间的最佳距离和每种方法的总成本。该项目的主要目标是在考虑到该项目的经济效益的情况下,找到这些EOR方法的最佳井距,并通过SAGD和VAPEX方法提高稠油油藏的产量。在这个项目中,SAGD和VAPEX方法进行了建模,以提高产量。对提高采收率(EOR)的每个阶段进行了模拟和修改,包括注入模式、生产和注水井的位置,以及不同注汽和注溶剂的调整。本项目分析了SAGD方法在浅层储层(RF为69.8%)和深层储层(RF为38%)的应用。此外,本研究还发现了SAGD方法的最大允许深度(3500英尺)。根据软件计算,该储层的热损失约为350°F。SAGD的累积采油方法浅油藏为3.87×10 ^ 6桶,和深水库was2.1×10 ^ 6桶,它VAPEX方法浅油藏为2.74×10 ^ 6桶,在深部储层约2.64×10 ^ 6桶,结果的基础上每个方法VAPEX方法保持同样的质量在水库,然而,SAGD的深层储层产量下降意味着这种方法不适合深水库。并计算了每种方法的利润;SAGD和VAPEX两种工艺在浅层油藏的利润分别为190.97 MM$和168.97 MM$,在深层油藏的利润分别为72.97 MM$和162.32 MM$。最后,得到了注采井在不同距离下的间距,最佳间距为30 m。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of Optimal Distance Between Wells in SAGD and VAPEX Methods Using Reservoir Simulation
Energy resource extraction is getting more difficult and using the enhanced and advanced level of technology for oil production is getting more common. Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) and Vapor extraction (VAPEX) are two favorable methods of EOR in heavy oil reservoirs. However, there are some obscure points about these methods, like optimum distances between wells and the overall cost of each method. The main objectives of this project were to find the best distance of wells in these types of EOR methods and to enhance the production of heavy oil reservoirs by SAGD and VAPEX methods, taking into consideration of the economic aspects of this project. In this project, SAGD and VAPEX methods were modeled to increase the production rate. Each stage of the Enhance Oil Recovery (EOR) was simulated and modified through many scenarios in terms of the injection patterns, production & injection wells’ locations as well as the adjustment of different injection steam injection and solvent injection. This project analyzed the SAGD method in the shallow reservoir (RF of 69.8%), and in the deep reservoir (RF of 38%). In addition, the maximum allowable depth to apply the SAGD method was found in this study (3500ft). Based on the calculation from the software, it was observed that the heat loss for this reservoir was around 350°F. The cumulative oil production of the SAGD method in the shallow reservoir was 3.87×10^6 bbl and the deep reservoir was2.1×10^6 bbl, and it for the VAPEX method at the shallow reservoir was 2.74×10^6 bbl, and at deep reservoir around 2.64×10^6 bbl, based on the results of each method the VAPEX method remain with the same quality at both reservoirs, however, the SAGD has the lower production in the deep reservoir which means this method is not suitable for the deep reservoir. Furthermore, the profit of each method was calculated; the profit of SAGD and VAPEX were (190.97 MM$ & 168.97 MM$) at the shallow reservoir, and (72.97 MM$ 162.32 MM$) at the deep reservoir for each process. Finally, the spacing between injection and production wells was obtained at different distances and the best distance was 30 m.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信