{"title":"女性公交上下楼梯时地面反作用力变化的定量分析","authors":"Seung-Hyun Hyun, Che-Cheong Ryew","doi":"10.5103/KJSB.2017.27.3.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"force has close relation with vertical height of stair during stair gait, as usual bus for public transportation has higher height of stair than that of the others of building, tracking & climb course, vehicles etc.. Stair standard of domestic bus's vertical height of bus showed 27.00±1.32 cm of 1st, 26.50±2.17 cm of 2nd stair, and 37.66±0.28 cm of 3rd stair on the basis of descending (Ryew & Hyun, 2013). Also if lined up at designated bus stoppage exactly, stair height of 19.66 cm was rather higher slightly than 18 cm of architectural standard (Yoon, 2008) except for vertical height (18 cm) of side walk block, Objective: The aim of the study was to compare & analyze on the variations of ground reaction force during ascending and descending of bus stair. Method: Simulated wooden stair of bus (raiser: 37.66 cm, width: 109 cm, tread: 29 cm) and GRF system (AMTI-OR-7/ AMTI., USA) was set up within experimental room. Adult female (n=8) performed ascending & descending of simulated bus stair, and variables analyzed consisted of TT (transfer-time), PVF (peak vertical force), LR (loading rate), DR (decay rate), CV (coefficient of variation) and AI (asymmetry index). Sample data from GRF cut off at 1,000 Hz. Results: TT showed shortest variation at phase 1 during descending, but longest variation at phase 1 during ascending of stair. PVF19 (Fz2, 100%) showed large pattern during descending than that of ascending, but rather showed small pattern during ascending of stair in case of PVF2 (Fz4). LR showed larger pattern during descending than that of ascending, but rather during ascending of stair in case of DR. Variation of CV (%) did not show difference between LR and DR, but showed higher possible occurrence of variation during descending of stair. Also AI (%) showed higher index during ascending than that of descending of stair. Conclusion: Because introduction of lowered bus stair has various realistic problems, if lined up at designated bus stopage exactly, rather can solve problems of inconvenience, reduce impulsive force and secure a stability of COG during ascending & descending of stair.","PeriodicalId":306685,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Analysis on the Variations of Ground Reaction Force during Ascent and Descent of Bus Stairs in Women\",\"authors\":\"Seung-Hyun Hyun, Che-Cheong Ryew\",\"doi\":\"10.5103/KJSB.2017.27.3.181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"force has close relation with vertical height of stair during stair gait, as usual bus for public transportation has higher height of stair than that of the others of building, tracking & climb course, vehicles etc.. Stair standard of domestic bus's vertical height of bus showed 27.00±1.32 cm of 1st, 26.50±2.17 cm of 2nd stair, and 37.66±0.28 cm of 3rd stair on the basis of descending (Ryew & Hyun, 2013). Also if lined up at designated bus stoppage exactly, stair height of 19.66 cm was rather higher slightly than 18 cm of architectural standard (Yoon, 2008) except for vertical height (18 cm) of side walk block, Objective: The aim of the study was to compare & analyze on the variations of ground reaction force during ascending and descending of bus stair. Method: Simulated wooden stair of bus (raiser: 37.66 cm, width: 109 cm, tread: 29 cm) and GRF system (AMTI-OR-7/ AMTI., USA) was set up within experimental room. Adult female (n=8) performed ascending & descending of simulated bus stair, and variables analyzed consisted of TT (transfer-time), PVF (peak vertical force), LR (loading rate), DR (decay rate), CV (coefficient of variation) and AI (asymmetry index). Sample data from GRF cut off at 1,000 Hz. Results: TT showed shortest variation at phase 1 during descending, but longest variation at phase 1 during ascending of stair. PVF19 (Fz2, 100%) showed large pattern during descending than that of ascending, but rather showed small pattern during ascending of stair in case of PVF2 (Fz4). LR showed larger pattern during descending than that of ascending, but rather during ascending of stair in case of DR. Variation of CV (%) did not show difference between LR and DR, but showed higher possible occurrence of variation during descending of stair. Also AI (%) showed higher index during ascending than that of descending of stair. Conclusion: Because introduction of lowered bus stair has various realistic problems, if lined up at designated bus stopage exactly, rather can solve problems of inconvenience, reduce impulsive force and secure a stability of COG during ascending & descending of stair.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2017.27.3.181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2017.27.3.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在楼梯行走过程中,力与楼梯的垂直高度密切相关,如公共交通车辆的楼梯高度通常高于建筑物、跟踪爬坡路线、车辆等。国内公交车楼梯标准公交车垂直高度为:1级27.00±1.32 cm, 2级26.50±2.17 cm, 3级37.66±0.28 cm (Ryew & Hyun, 2013)。此外,如果准确地在指定的公交车站排队,19.66厘米的楼梯高度略高于建筑标准的18厘米(Yoon, 2008),除了侧面步行块的垂直高度(18厘米)。目的:研究的目的是比较和分析公交楼梯上升和下降过程中地面反作用力的变化。方法:模拟公交木楼梯(升程:37.66 cm,宽度:109 cm,踏面:29 cm),采用GRF系统(AMTI- or -7/ AMTI)。(美国)在实验室内设置。成年女性(n=8)进行模拟公交楼梯的上下行走,分析变量包括TT(转移时间)、PVF(峰值垂直力)、LR(加载率)、DR(衰减率)、CV(变异系数)和AI(不对称指数)。来自GRF的样本数据在1,000 Hz时被切断。结果:TT在下降阶段变化时间最短,而在上升阶段变化时间最长。PVF19 (Fz2, 100%)在下降过程中表现出比上升过程大的模式,而PVF2 (Fz4)在上升过程中表现出小的模式。CV(%)的变异在LR和DR之间无显著差异,但在下降过程中变异的可能性更大。AI(%)在上升阶段的指数高于下降阶段。结论:由于公交下行楼梯的引入存在各种现实问题,如果在指定的公交站位准确排队,反而可以解决上下楼梯时的不便问题,减少冲力,保证上下楼梯时COG的稳定。
Quantitative Analysis on the Variations of Ground Reaction Force during Ascent and Descent of Bus Stairs in Women
force has close relation with vertical height of stair during stair gait, as usual bus for public transportation has higher height of stair than that of the others of building, tracking & climb course, vehicles etc.. Stair standard of domestic bus's vertical height of bus showed 27.00±1.32 cm of 1st, 26.50±2.17 cm of 2nd stair, and 37.66±0.28 cm of 3rd stair on the basis of descending (Ryew & Hyun, 2013). Also if lined up at designated bus stoppage exactly, stair height of 19.66 cm was rather higher slightly than 18 cm of architectural standard (Yoon, 2008) except for vertical height (18 cm) of side walk block, Objective: The aim of the study was to compare & analyze on the variations of ground reaction force during ascending and descending of bus stair. Method: Simulated wooden stair of bus (raiser: 37.66 cm, width: 109 cm, tread: 29 cm) and GRF system (AMTI-OR-7/ AMTI., USA) was set up within experimental room. Adult female (n=8) performed ascending & descending of simulated bus stair, and variables analyzed consisted of TT (transfer-time), PVF (peak vertical force), LR (loading rate), DR (decay rate), CV (coefficient of variation) and AI (asymmetry index). Sample data from GRF cut off at 1,000 Hz. Results: TT showed shortest variation at phase 1 during descending, but longest variation at phase 1 during ascending of stair. PVF19 (Fz2, 100%) showed large pattern during descending than that of ascending, but rather showed small pattern during ascending of stair in case of PVF2 (Fz4). LR showed larger pattern during descending than that of ascending, but rather during ascending of stair in case of DR. Variation of CV (%) did not show difference between LR and DR, but showed higher possible occurrence of variation during descending of stair. Also AI (%) showed higher index during ascending than that of descending of stair. Conclusion: Because introduction of lowered bus stair has various realistic problems, if lined up at designated bus stopage exactly, rather can solve problems of inconvenience, reduce impulsive force and secure a stability of COG during ascending & descending of stair.