构图方法论:当代问题的个体化

Celia Lury
{"title":"构图方法论:当代问题的个体化","authors":"Celia Lury","doi":"10.14361/9783839446409-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary focus of Gilbert Simondon’s writings is the problematic of individuation (1992; 2017); a subsidiary but integral dimension of this focus is a concern with the individuation of a problematic. In this essay, I explore some of the methodological aspects of this process. At a fundamental level, approaching the construction of a problematic as a process of individuation, Simondon provides an alternative to theories of knowledge in which the possibility of knowledge is grounded in the constituting activity of the knowing subject. As he puts it, ‘We cannot know individuation in the common sense of the phrase; we can only individuate, individuate ourselves and in ourselves’ (1992: 317). In Simondon’s approach to the individuation of a problematic, metaphysics and logic are merged in what is called transduction, that is, a recursive analogical operation in which the process of individuation ‘between the real exterior and the subject is grasped by the subject due to the analogical individuation of knowledge in the subject’ (Simondon quoted in Combes, 2012: 9; my italics). Transduction is the analogical and self-grounding dimension of the procedure of thought. As Adrian Mackenzie explains,","PeriodicalId":244847,"journal":{"name":"Thinking the Problematic","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compositional Methodology: On the Individuation of a Problematic of the Contemporary\",\"authors\":\"Celia Lury\",\"doi\":\"10.14361/9783839446409-007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The primary focus of Gilbert Simondon’s writings is the problematic of individuation (1992; 2017); a subsidiary but integral dimension of this focus is a concern with the individuation of a problematic. In this essay, I explore some of the methodological aspects of this process. At a fundamental level, approaching the construction of a problematic as a process of individuation, Simondon provides an alternative to theories of knowledge in which the possibility of knowledge is grounded in the constituting activity of the knowing subject. As he puts it, ‘We cannot know individuation in the common sense of the phrase; we can only individuate, individuate ourselves and in ourselves’ (1992: 317). In Simondon’s approach to the individuation of a problematic, metaphysics and logic are merged in what is called transduction, that is, a recursive analogical operation in which the process of individuation ‘between the real exterior and the subject is grasped by the subject due to the analogical individuation of knowledge in the subject’ (Simondon quoted in Combes, 2012: 9; my italics). Transduction is the analogical and self-grounding dimension of the procedure of thought. As Adrian Mackenzie explains,\",\"PeriodicalId\":244847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking the Problematic\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking the Problematic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839446409-007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking the Problematic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839446409-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

吉尔伯特·西蒙顿(Gilbert Simondon)作品的主要焦点是个性化问题(1992;2017);这种关注的一个次要但不可或缺的方面是关注问题的个性化。在这篇文章中,我探讨了这个过程的一些方法论方面。在基本层面上,西蒙顿将问题的构建作为一个个性化的过程,为知识理论提供了另一种选择,在这种理论中,知识的可能性建立在认识主体的构成活动的基础上。正如他所言,“我们无法理解‘个性化’这个词的常识;我们只能个性化,个性化我们自己和在我们自己”(1992:317)。在西蒙东的问题个体化方法中,形而上学和逻辑融合在所谓的转导中,即递归的类比操作,其中个体化过程“在真实的外部和主体之间,由于主体中知识的类比个体化而被主体掌握”(西蒙东在Combes中引用,2012:9;我的斜体)。转导是思维过程的类比性的、自扎根的维度。阿德里安·麦肯齐解释道,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compositional Methodology: On the Individuation of a Problematic of the Contemporary
The primary focus of Gilbert Simondon’s writings is the problematic of individuation (1992; 2017); a subsidiary but integral dimension of this focus is a concern with the individuation of a problematic. In this essay, I explore some of the methodological aspects of this process. At a fundamental level, approaching the construction of a problematic as a process of individuation, Simondon provides an alternative to theories of knowledge in which the possibility of knowledge is grounded in the constituting activity of the knowing subject. As he puts it, ‘We cannot know individuation in the common sense of the phrase; we can only individuate, individuate ourselves and in ourselves’ (1992: 317). In Simondon’s approach to the individuation of a problematic, metaphysics and logic are merged in what is called transduction, that is, a recursive analogical operation in which the process of individuation ‘between the real exterior and the subject is grasped by the subject due to the analogical individuation of knowledge in the subject’ (Simondon quoted in Combes, 2012: 9; my italics). Transduction is the analogical and self-grounding dimension of the procedure of thought. As Adrian Mackenzie explains,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信