高等教育转型的经验与期望:质的探索

Tia Goldring, Emma Harper, Ricky Jassal, Lorrianne Joseph, A. Kelly, H. Mulrooney, Ian Piper, Hayden Walker
{"title":"高等教育转型的经验与期望:质的探索","authors":"Tia Goldring, Emma Harper, Ricky Jassal, Lorrianne Joseph, A. Kelly, H. Mulrooney, Ian Piper, Hayden Walker","doi":"10.29311/NDTPS.V0I13.2849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transition to higher education is challenging, and may be more difficult for some groups than others. The transition from level 3 foundation year into level 4 offers the opportunity to explore student perspectives. Qualitative survey and focus group data were collected from current and previous Level 3 students, to ascertain student perceptions about induction, level of belonging, confidence about Level 4 and to identify useful support sources.  Over a third of eligible Level 3 students (n=102) participated, but numbers of eligible participants from Levels 4, 5 and 6 were limited. Despite the heterogeneous nature of Level 3 students the majority of students recognised the value of the foundation year. Data suggested that Level 3 students did not identify with the university. Those who did highlighted the importance of social outlets such as clubs and societies. A major cause of dissatisfaction was perceived lack of clarity about the foundation year, including the programme, subjects and physical location of the course. This was apparent across all ethnicities, age groups and both genders. Among previous Level 3 students, personal sources of support were uniformly valued although the precise source varied by year of study. Support from academic staff, via office hours and as personal tutors, was rated as most important.  Enabling academic staff to offer support to students throughout their study, and clear consistent information available throughout an ongoing transition, may help to minimise these issues.","PeriodicalId":174795,"journal":{"name":"New directions in the teaching of physical sciences","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience and expectations of transition to higher education: a qualitative exploration\",\"authors\":\"Tia Goldring, Emma Harper, Ricky Jassal, Lorrianne Joseph, A. Kelly, H. Mulrooney, Ian Piper, Hayden Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.29311/NDTPS.V0I13.2849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Transition to higher education is challenging, and may be more difficult for some groups than others. The transition from level 3 foundation year into level 4 offers the opportunity to explore student perspectives. Qualitative survey and focus group data were collected from current and previous Level 3 students, to ascertain student perceptions about induction, level of belonging, confidence about Level 4 and to identify useful support sources.  Over a third of eligible Level 3 students (n=102) participated, but numbers of eligible participants from Levels 4, 5 and 6 were limited. Despite the heterogeneous nature of Level 3 students the majority of students recognised the value of the foundation year. Data suggested that Level 3 students did not identify with the university. Those who did highlighted the importance of social outlets such as clubs and societies. A major cause of dissatisfaction was perceived lack of clarity about the foundation year, including the programme, subjects and physical location of the course. This was apparent across all ethnicities, age groups and both genders. Among previous Level 3 students, personal sources of support were uniformly valued although the precise source varied by year of study. Support from academic staff, via office hours and as personal tutors, was rated as most important.  Enabling academic staff to offer support to students throughout their study, and clear consistent information available throughout an ongoing transition, may help to minimise these issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New directions in the teaching of physical sciences\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New directions in the teaching of physical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29311/NDTPS.V0I13.2849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New directions in the teaching of physical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29311/NDTPS.V0I13.2849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

向高等教育的过渡是具有挑战性的,对某些群体来说可能比其他群体更困难。从3级基础学年到4级基础学年的过渡提供了探索学生观点的机会。定性调查和焦点小组数据收集来自当前和以前的3级学生,以确定学生对诱导,归属水平,对4级的信心的看法,并确定有用的支持来源。超过三分之一的符合条件的3级学生(n=102)参加了测试,但符合条件的4级、5级和6级的参与者数量有限。尽管三年级学生的性质不同,但大多数学生都认识到基础学年的价值。数据显示,三级学生并不认同大学。这些人强调了俱乐部和社团等社交渠道的重要性。不满的一个主要原因是人们认为预科课程不够明确,包括课程、科目和课程的地理位置。这在所有种族、年龄组和性别中都很明显。在以前的三级学生中,个人支持来源的价值是一致的,尽管确切的来源因学习年份而异。学术人员通过办公时间和私人导师的支持被认为是最重要的。使学术人员在整个学习过程中为学生提供支持,并在持续的过渡过程中提供清晰一致的信息,可能有助于最大限度地减少这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experience and expectations of transition to higher education: a qualitative exploration
Transition to higher education is challenging, and may be more difficult for some groups than others. The transition from level 3 foundation year into level 4 offers the opportunity to explore student perspectives. Qualitative survey and focus group data were collected from current and previous Level 3 students, to ascertain student perceptions about induction, level of belonging, confidence about Level 4 and to identify useful support sources.  Over a third of eligible Level 3 students (n=102) participated, but numbers of eligible participants from Levels 4, 5 and 6 were limited. Despite the heterogeneous nature of Level 3 students the majority of students recognised the value of the foundation year. Data suggested that Level 3 students did not identify with the university. Those who did highlighted the importance of social outlets such as clubs and societies. A major cause of dissatisfaction was perceived lack of clarity about the foundation year, including the programme, subjects and physical location of the course. This was apparent across all ethnicities, age groups and both genders. Among previous Level 3 students, personal sources of support were uniformly valued although the precise source varied by year of study. Support from academic staff, via office hours and as personal tutors, was rated as most important.  Enabling academic staff to offer support to students throughout their study, and clear consistent information available throughout an ongoing transition, may help to minimise these issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信