{"title":"印欧加兰语*-nt-中的形容词和梵语中的分词","authors":"J. Lowe","doi":"10.13109/HISP.2014.127.1.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The suffix *-nt- is taken for granted as a Caland suffix in two of the most recent and important works on the Caland system, those by Nussbaum (1976) and Rau (2009), but other authors have entirely ignored the suffix, usually treating alleged examples rather as participles.1 This paper re-examines the morphological, syntactic and semantic evidence for a category of *-nt- adjectives associated with the Caland system distinct from the categories of active present and aorist participles. I also consider several forms in Indo-Iranian which have not previously been considered as potential Caland adjectives: citant-, śucant-, tujant-, bhrājant-, sahant-, p ŕṣant-. Morphological and syntactic evidence shows that no single form must be analysed as a Caland adjective in contradistinction to anything else; on the other hand, the combined weight of evidence supports the supposition that a synchronically distinct adjectival suffix *-nt- did exist in Proto- Indo-European. The morphological evidence for a dis...","PeriodicalId":177751,"journal":{"name":"Historische Sprachforschung","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indo-European Caland Adjectives in *-nt- and Participles in Sanskrit\",\"authors\":\"J. Lowe\",\"doi\":\"10.13109/HISP.2014.127.1.166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The suffix *-nt- is taken for granted as a Caland suffix in two of the most recent and important works on the Caland system, those by Nussbaum (1976) and Rau (2009), but other authors have entirely ignored the suffix, usually treating alleged examples rather as participles.1 This paper re-examines the morphological, syntactic and semantic evidence for a category of *-nt- adjectives associated with the Caland system distinct from the categories of active present and aorist participles. I also consider several forms in Indo-Iranian which have not previously been considered as potential Caland adjectives: citant-, śucant-, tujant-, bhrājant-, sahant-, p ŕṣant-. Morphological and syntactic evidence shows that no single form must be analysed as a Caland adjective in contradistinction to anything else; on the other hand, the combined weight of evidence supports the supposition that a synchronically distinct adjectival suffix *-nt- did exist in Proto- Indo-European. The morphological evidence for a dis...\",\"PeriodicalId\":177751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historische Sprachforschung\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historische Sprachforschung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13109/HISP.2014.127.1.166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historische Sprachforschung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/HISP.2014.127.1.166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
后缀*-nt-在Nussbaum(1976)和Rau(2009)最近的两本关于Caland系统的重要著作中被理所当然地认为是一个Caland后缀,但其他作者完全忽略了后缀,通常将所谓的例子视为分词本文从词法、句法和语义等方面重新考察了与Caland系统相关的一类*-nt-形容词与主动现在时分词和主动现在时分词的区别。我还考虑了印度-伊朗语中的几种形式,它们以前没有被认为是潜在的加兰形容词:citant-, śucant-, tujant-, bhrājant-, sahant-, p ŕṣant-。形态学和句法上的证据表明,没有任何一种形式必须作为加兰形容词来分析,与其他任何形式相比较;另一方面,综合证据的分量支持这样的假设,即在原始印欧语中确实存在一个同步不同的形容词后缀*-nt-。这种疾病的形态学证据…
Indo-European Caland Adjectives in *-nt- and Participles in Sanskrit
Abstract The suffix *-nt- is taken for granted as a Caland suffix in two of the most recent and important works on the Caland system, those by Nussbaum (1976) and Rau (2009), but other authors have entirely ignored the suffix, usually treating alleged examples rather as participles.1 This paper re-examines the morphological, syntactic and semantic evidence for a category of *-nt- adjectives associated with the Caland system distinct from the categories of active present and aorist participles. I also consider several forms in Indo-Iranian which have not previously been considered as potential Caland adjectives: citant-, śucant-, tujant-, bhrājant-, sahant-, p ŕṣant-. Morphological and syntactic evidence shows that no single form must be analysed as a Caland adjective in contradistinction to anything else; on the other hand, the combined weight of evidence supports the supposition that a synchronically distinct adjectival suffix *-nt- did exist in Proto- Indo-European. The morphological evidence for a dis...