基于决策树知识的研究伦理协议评审系统

R. Anggraini, Nurul Fajrin Ariyani, A. F. Septiyanto, R. Sarno, Z. D. Meilani, Triono Soendoro
{"title":"基于决策树知识的研究伦理协议评审系统","authors":"R. Anggraini, Nurul Fajrin Ariyani, A. F. Septiyanto, R. Sarno, Z. D. Meilani, Triono Soendoro","doi":"10.1109/COMNETSAT56033.2022.9994414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge base systems have undergone many developments in providing similar results to experts. This can help increase time effectiveness in determining decisions and analysis results. Several methods have given good results in determining decisions based on knowledge, one of which is using a decision tree. In this study, the researchers applied decision tree modeling to determine the results of the review on ethical research protocols. Our target is to classify ethical protocols into one of three decisions: Exempted, Expedited, or Full Board. Three decision tree models are used in this research to evaluate the best results that can predict the ethical review protocol results according to the expert's dataset. The experiments showed that all models showed the same result, with an accuracy value of 0,91, precision of 0,93, and recall of 0,91. However, manual checking showed that the second model with Gini criteria parameters and class weight balance resulted in 10 data correctly predicted based on the dataset used.","PeriodicalId":221444,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Decision Tree Knowledge-based System for Reviewing Research Ethics Protocol\",\"authors\":\"R. Anggraini, Nurul Fajrin Ariyani, A. F. Septiyanto, R. Sarno, Z. D. Meilani, Triono Soendoro\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMNETSAT56033.2022.9994414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Knowledge base systems have undergone many developments in providing similar results to experts. This can help increase time effectiveness in determining decisions and analysis results. Several methods have given good results in determining decisions based on knowledge, one of which is using a decision tree. In this study, the researchers applied decision tree modeling to determine the results of the review on ethical research protocols. Our target is to classify ethical protocols into one of three decisions: Exempted, Expedited, or Full Board. Three decision tree models are used in this research to evaluate the best results that can predict the ethical review protocol results according to the expert's dataset. The experiments showed that all models showed the same result, with an accuracy value of 0,91, precision of 0,93, and recall of 0,91. However, manual checking showed that the second model with Gini criteria parameters and class weight balance resulted in 10 data correctly predicted based on the dataset used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMNETSAT56033.2022.9994414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMNETSAT56033.2022.9994414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

知识库系统在向专家提供类似结果方面经历了许多发展。这有助于提高决定决策和分析结果的时间效率。有几种方法在基于知识的决策中取得了很好的效果,其中一种是使用决策树。在这项研究中,研究人员应用决策树模型来确定伦理研究方案的审查结果。我们的目标是将伦理协议分为以下三种:豁免、加速或全面审议。本研究采用三种决策树模型,根据专家数据集对伦理审查方案结果的最佳预测结果进行评估。实验表明,所有模型结果一致,准确率为0.91,精密度为0.93,召回率为0.91。然而,人工检查表明,第二个模型与基尼标准参数和类权重平衡导致10个数据正确预测基于所使用的数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Decision Tree Knowledge-based System for Reviewing Research Ethics Protocol
Knowledge base systems have undergone many developments in providing similar results to experts. This can help increase time effectiveness in determining decisions and analysis results. Several methods have given good results in determining decisions based on knowledge, one of which is using a decision tree. In this study, the researchers applied decision tree modeling to determine the results of the review on ethical research protocols. Our target is to classify ethical protocols into one of three decisions: Exempted, Expedited, or Full Board. Three decision tree models are used in this research to evaluate the best results that can predict the ethical review protocol results according to the expert's dataset. The experiments showed that all models showed the same result, with an accuracy value of 0,91, precision of 0,93, and recall of 0,91. However, manual checking showed that the second model with Gini criteria parameters and class weight balance resulted in 10 data correctly predicted based on the dataset used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信