{"title":"介绍和如何融合可以帮助你","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110703009-206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bringing in ideas from analogous fields turns out to be a potential source of radical innovation. When you ’ re working on a problem and you pool insights from analogous areas, you ’ re likely to get significantly greater novelty in the proposed solutions, for two rea-sons: People versed in analogous fields can draw on different pools of knowledge, and they ’ re not mentally constrained by existing, “ known ” solutions to the problem in the tar-get field. The greater the distance between the problem and the analogous field, the greater the novelty of the solutions . . . consider our recent study in which we recruited hundreds of roofers, carpenters, and inline skaters to contribute their insights to the problem of workers ’ reluctance to use safety gear because of discomfort. . . . Each group was significantly better at thinking of novel solutions for the other fields than for its own.","PeriodicalId":382466,"journal":{"name":"Famous Business Fusions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction and How Fusion Can Help You\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110703009-206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bringing in ideas from analogous fields turns out to be a potential source of radical innovation. When you ’ re working on a problem and you pool insights from analogous areas, you ’ re likely to get significantly greater novelty in the proposed solutions, for two rea-sons: People versed in analogous fields can draw on different pools of knowledge, and they ’ re not mentally constrained by existing, “ known ” solutions to the problem in the tar-get field. The greater the distance between the problem and the analogous field, the greater the novelty of the solutions . . . consider our recent study in which we recruited hundreds of roofers, carpenters, and inline skaters to contribute their insights to the problem of workers ’ reluctance to use safety gear because of discomfort. . . . Each group was significantly better at thinking of novel solutions for the other fields than for its own.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Famous Business Fusions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Famous Business Fusions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110703009-206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Famous Business Fusions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110703009-206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bringing in ideas from analogous fields turns out to be a potential source of radical innovation. When you ’ re working on a problem and you pool insights from analogous areas, you ’ re likely to get significantly greater novelty in the proposed solutions, for two rea-sons: People versed in analogous fields can draw on different pools of knowledge, and they ’ re not mentally constrained by existing, “ known ” solutions to the problem in the tar-get field. The greater the distance between the problem and the analogous field, the greater the novelty of the solutions . . . consider our recent study in which we recruited hundreds of roofers, carpenters, and inline skaters to contribute their insights to the problem of workers ’ reluctance to use safety gear because of discomfort. . . . Each group was significantly better at thinking of novel solutions for the other fields than for its own.