S. Albers, M. Mitzenmacher
{"title":"首次拟合和随机拟合装箱的平均情况分析","authors":"S. Albers, M. Mitzenmacher","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1098-2418(200005)16:3%3C240::AID-RSA2%3E3.0.CO;2-V","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We prove that the First Fit bin packing algorithm is stable under the input distribution Uk − 2; k for all k ≥ 3, settling an open question from the recent survey by Coffman, Garey, and Johnson [“Approximation algorithms for bin backing: A survey,” Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems, D. Hochbaum (Editor), PWS, Boston, 1996]. Our proof generalizes the multidimensional Markov chain analysis used by Kenyon, Sinclair, and Rabani to prove that Best Fit is also stable under these distributions [Proc Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 1995, pp. 351–358]. Our proof is motivated by an analysis of Random Fit, a new simple packing algorithm related to First Fit, that is interesting in its own right. We show that Random Fit is stable under the input distributions Uk− 2; k, as well as present worst case bounds and some results on distributions Uk− 1; k and Uk; k for Random Fit. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 16, 240–259, 2000 Correspondence to: Michael Mitzenmacher. *Most of this work was done while at the Max-Planch-Institut fur Informatik, Saarbrucken, Germany. † A substantial portion of this research was done while at the Computer Science Department, UC Berkeley and Digital Equipment Corporation Systems Research Center. Contract grant sponsor: National Science Foundation. Contract grant number: CCR-9505448. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.","PeriodicalId":303496,"journal":{"name":"Random Struct. Algorithms","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Average-case analyses of first fit and random fit bin packing\",\"authors\":\"S. Albers, M. Mitzenmacher\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1098-2418(200005)16:3%3C240::AID-RSA2%3E3.0.CO;2-V\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We prove that the First Fit bin packing algorithm is stable under the input distribution Uk − 2; k for all k ≥ 3, settling an open question from the recent survey by Coffman, Garey, and Johnson [“Approximation algorithms for bin backing: A survey,” Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems, D. Hochbaum (Editor), PWS, Boston, 1996]. Our proof generalizes the multidimensional Markov chain analysis used by Kenyon, Sinclair, and Rabani to prove that Best Fit is also stable under these distributions [Proc Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 1995, pp. 351–358]. Our proof is motivated by an analysis of Random Fit, a new simple packing algorithm related to First Fit, that is interesting in its own right. We show that Random Fit is stable under the input distributions Uk− 2; k, as well as present worst case bounds and some results on distributions Uk− 1; k and Uk; k for Random Fit. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 16, 240–259, 2000 Correspondence to: Michael Mitzenmacher. *Most of this work was done while at the Max-Planch-Institut fur Informatik, Saarbrucken, Germany. † A substantial portion of this research was done while at the Computer Science Department, UC Berkeley and Digital Equipment Corporation Systems Research Center. Contract grant sponsor: National Science Foundation. Contract grant number: CCR-9505448. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":303496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Random Struct. Algorithms\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Random Struct. Algorithms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2418(200005)16:3%3C240::AID-RSA2%3E3.0.CO;2-V\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Random Struct. Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2418(200005)16:3%3C240::AID-RSA2%3E3.0.CO;2-V","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61
Average-case analyses of first fit and random fit bin packing
We prove that the First Fit bin packing algorithm is stable under the input distribution Uk − 2; k for all k ≥ 3, settling an open question from the recent survey by Coffman, Garey, and Johnson [“Approximation algorithms for bin backing: A survey,” Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems, D. Hochbaum (Editor), PWS, Boston, 1996]. Our proof generalizes the multidimensional Markov chain analysis used by Kenyon, Sinclair, and Rabani to prove that Best Fit is also stable under these distributions [Proc Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 1995, pp. 351–358]. Our proof is motivated by an analysis of Random Fit, a new simple packing algorithm related to First Fit, that is interesting in its own right. We show that Random Fit is stable under the input distributions Uk− 2; k, as well as present worst case bounds and some results on distributions Uk− 1; k and Uk; k for Random Fit. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 16, 240–259, 2000 Correspondence to: Michael Mitzenmacher. *Most of this work was done while at the Max-Planch-Institut fur Informatik, Saarbrucken, Germany. † A substantial portion of this research was done while at the Computer Science Department, UC Berkeley and Digital Equipment Corporation Systems Research Center. Contract grant sponsor: National Science Foundation. Contract grant number: CCR-9505448. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.