临床案例学习对医学生4周后腰椎穿刺能力的影响

H. Storm
{"title":"临床案例学习对医学生4周后腰椎穿刺能力的影响","authors":"H. Storm","doi":"10.2174/1876519X01306010035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate medical students' perceptions of acceptability of a simula- tion-based lumbar puncture (LP) course and its effect on standardized LP performance four weeks later. Tests were also conducted to find out whether skills were improved by including a clinical case to establish the relevance of the learning material in the LP course. Methods: Medical students in their pediatric term (n=45) were invited to participate and were randomly divided into three groups. The simulation group was offered only the LP course, while the simulation and clinical case group was offered a clinical case leading to performing LP on an infant before attending the actual LP course. The groups were tested four weeks after the LP courses together with a control group that had attended neither the LP course nor the clinical case. The testing was conducted by awarding points, up to a maximum of 26, for the different correct actions performed during the LP procedure. Results: The medical students in the skill group (n=11) performed similarly to the students in the skill and clinical case group (n=9), 14.2 (+/- 4.4) and 13.9 (+/- 4.3) respectively, and better than the control group, (n=10) 5.6 (+/-4.8) (p<0.01). Conclusions: When tested, the medical students who had completed the LP course performed better than the control group that had not been offered this course during their pediatric term. Hence, introducing a clinical case in the LP course did not improve LP skills.","PeriodicalId":304672,"journal":{"name":"The Open Medical Education Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of How Studying a Clinical Case Influences Medical Students' Capabilities for Performing a Lumbar Puncture Four Weeks Later\",\"authors\":\"H. Storm\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1876519X01306010035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate medical students' perceptions of acceptability of a simula- tion-based lumbar puncture (LP) course and its effect on standardized LP performance four weeks later. Tests were also conducted to find out whether skills were improved by including a clinical case to establish the relevance of the learning material in the LP course. Methods: Medical students in their pediatric term (n=45) were invited to participate and were randomly divided into three groups. The simulation group was offered only the LP course, while the simulation and clinical case group was offered a clinical case leading to performing LP on an infant before attending the actual LP course. The groups were tested four weeks after the LP courses together with a control group that had attended neither the LP course nor the clinical case. The testing was conducted by awarding points, up to a maximum of 26, for the different correct actions performed during the LP procedure. Results: The medical students in the skill group (n=11) performed similarly to the students in the skill and clinical case group (n=9), 14.2 (+/- 4.4) and 13.9 (+/- 4.3) respectively, and better than the control group, (n=10) 5.6 (+/-4.8) (p<0.01). Conclusions: When tested, the medical students who had completed the LP course performed better than the control group that had not been offered this course during their pediatric term. Hence, introducing a clinical case in the LP course did not improve LP skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Medical Education Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Medical Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876519X01306010035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876519X01306010035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估医学生对模拟腰椎穿刺(LP)课程的可接受性及其对四周后标准化腰椎穿刺表现的影响。还进行了测试,以确定通过纳入临床病例来确定LP课程中学习材料的相关性,是否提高了技能。方法:随机分为3组,选取45名儿科专业医学生为研究对象。模拟组只提供LP课程,而模拟和临床病例组在参加实际LP课程之前提供了一个临床病例,导致对婴儿进行LP。两组在LP课程结束四周后与既没有参加LP课程也没有参加临床病例的对照组一起进行测试。测试是通过对LP过程中执行的不同正确动作进行评分来进行的,最高可达26分。结果:技能组医学生(n=11)与技能组、临床病例组学生(n=9)、14.2(+/- 4.4)、13.9(+/- 4.3)表现相似,且优于对照组(n=10) 5.6 (+/-4.8) (p<0.01)。结论:当测试时,完成LP课程的医学生比在儿科学期没有提供该课程的对照组表现更好。因此,在LP课程中引入临床病例并不能提高LP技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of How Studying a Clinical Case Influences Medical Students' Capabilities for Performing a Lumbar Puncture Four Weeks Later
Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate medical students' perceptions of acceptability of a simula- tion-based lumbar puncture (LP) course and its effect on standardized LP performance four weeks later. Tests were also conducted to find out whether skills were improved by including a clinical case to establish the relevance of the learning material in the LP course. Methods: Medical students in their pediatric term (n=45) were invited to participate and were randomly divided into three groups. The simulation group was offered only the LP course, while the simulation and clinical case group was offered a clinical case leading to performing LP on an infant before attending the actual LP course. The groups were tested four weeks after the LP courses together with a control group that had attended neither the LP course nor the clinical case. The testing was conducted by awarding points, up to a maximum of 26, for the different correct actions performed during the LP procedure. Results: The medical students in the skill group (n=11) performed similarly to the students in the skill and clinical case group (n=9), 14.2 (+/- 4.4) and 13.9 (+/- 4.3) respectively, and better than the control group, (n=10) 5.6 (+/-4.8) (p<0.01). Conclusions: When tested, the medical students who had completed the LP course performed better than the control group that had not been offered this course during their pediatric term. Hence, introducing a clinical case in the LP course did not improve LP skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信