Aquarius测量值与l波段辐射传输模型的比较

E. Dinnat, D. L. Le Vine, S. Abraham, P. de Matthaeis, C. Utku
{"title":"Aquarius测量值与l波段辐射传输模型的比较","authors":"E. Dinnat, D. L. Le Vine, S. Abraham, P. de Matthaeis, C. Utku","doi":"10.1109/MICRORAD.2012.6185231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spaceborne radiometric measurements at L-band from the Aquarius instrument are compared to numerical model simulation. A calibration bias is estimated: of the order of 3K to 5K in vertical polarization, and of the order of 1.5 K or less in horizontal polarization. A bias temporal drift of about 1 K over five months is identified for all beams and polarizations. Measurements/model comparisons are also performed to assess the uncertainty of various aspects of the data processing that are critical for retrieving Sea Surface Salinity, such as the correction for Faraday rotation and the impact of sea surface roughness on the surface signal. Errors in the antenna pattern models are identified, that lead to significant biases in Faraday rotation angle. The precision of the model for surface roughness impact is estimated to be of the order of 0.25K over a large range of wind speeds, but is less accurate at the low and high end of the wind speed range, particularly for wind speeds much larger than 15 m/s.","PeriodicalId":122743,"journal":{"name":"2012 12th Specialist Meeting on Microwave Radiometry and Remote Sensing of the Environment (MicroRad)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Aquarius measurements and radiative transfer models at L-band\",\"authors\":\"E. Dinnat, D. L. Le Vine, S. Abraham, P. de Matthaeis, C. Utku\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MICRORAD.2012.6185231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spaceborne radiometric measurements at L-band from the Aquarius instrument are compared to numerical model simulation. A calibration bias is estimated: of the order of 3K to 5K in vertical polarization, and of the order of 1.5 K or less in horizontal polarization. A bias temporal drift of about 1 K over five months is identified for all beams and polarizations. Measurements/model comparisons are also performed to assess the uncertainty of various aspects of the data processing that are critical for retrieving Sea Surface Salinity, such as the correction for Faraday rotation and the impact of sea surface roughness on the surface signal. Errors in the antenna pattern models are identified, that lead to significant biases in Faraday rotation angle. The precision of the model for surface roughness impact is estimated to be of the order of 0.25K over a large range of wind speeds, but is less accurate at the low and high end of the wind speed range, particularly for wind speeds much larger than 15 m/s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 12th Specialist Meeting on Microwave Radiometry and Remote Sensing of the Environment (MicroRad)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 12th Specialist Meeting on Microwave Radiometry and Remote Sensing of the Environment (MicroRad)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MICRORAD.2012.6185231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 12th Specialist Meeting on Microwave Radiometry and Remote Sensing of the Environment (MicroRad)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MICRORAD.2012.6185231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

从宝瓶座仪器获得的星载l波段辐射测量结果与数值模型模拟结果进行了比较。估计校准偏差:垂直极化为3K至5K,水平极化为1.5 K或更小。在5个月内,所有的光束和偏振都有大约1 K的偏置时间漂移。还进行了测量/模型比较,以评估数据处理的各个方面的不确定性,这些方面对于检索海面盐度至关重要,例如法拉第旋转的校正和海面粗糙度对表面信号的影响。识别了天线方向图模型中的误差,这些误差会导致法拉第旋转角的显著偏差。在较大风速范围内,表面粗糙度影响模型的精度估计为0.25K左右,但在风速范围的低端和高端,特别是风速远远大于15米/秒时,精度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Aquarius measurements and radiative transfer models at L-band
Spaceborne radiometric measurements at L-band from the Aquarius instrument are compared to numerical model simulation. A calibration bias is estimated: of the order of 3K to 5K in vertical polarization, and of the order of 1.5 K or less in horizontal polarization. A bias temporal drift of about 1 K over five months is identified for all beams and polarizations. Measurements/model comparisons are also performed to assess the uncertainty of various aspects of the data processing that are critical for retrieving Sea Surface Salinity, such as the correction for Faraday rotation and the impact of sea surface roughness on the surface signal. Errors in the antenna pattern models are identified, that lead to significant biases in Faraday rotation angle. The precision of the model for surface roughness impact is estimated to be of the order of 0.25K over a large range of wind speeds, but is less accurate at the low and high end of the wind speed range, particularly for wind speeds much larger than 15 m/s.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信