使用故障树分析验证正式规范

Shaoying Liu
{"title":"使用故障树分析验证正式规范","authors":"Shaoying Liu","doi":"10.1109/ISPSE.2000.913248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Specification before implementation has been suggested as a sensible approach to software evolution. The quality of this approach may be improved by using formal specification. However, to serve as a trustable foundation for implementation and to help reduce the cost of program testing, the formal specification must be ensured to be satisfiable, consistent, complete and accurate in recording the user requirements. In this paper, we first define these four concepts and then introduce a technique for verifying formal specifications that combines fault-tree analysis with static analysis and testing techniques.","PeriodicalId":170375,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Symposium on Principles of Software Evolution","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verifying formal specifications using fault tree analysis\",\"authors\":\"Shaoying Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISPSE.2000.913248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Specification before implementation has been suggested as a sensible approach to software evolution. The quality of this approach may be improved by using formal specification. However, to serve as a trustable foundation for implementation and to help reduce the cost of program testing, the formal specification must be ensured to be satisfiable, consistent, complete and accurate in recording the user requirements. In this paper, we first define these four concepts and then introduce a technique for verifying formal specifications that combines fault-tree analysis with static analysis and testing techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings International Symposium on Principles of Software Evolution\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings International Symposium on Principles of Software Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPSE.2000.913248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Symposium on Principles of Software Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPSE.2000.913248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在实现之前的规范被认为是软件发展的一种明智的方法。这种方法的质量可以通过使用形式化规范来提高。然而,为了作为实现的可靠基础,并帮助减少程序测试的成本,必须确保正式的规范在记录用户需求时是可满足的、一致的、完整的和准确的。在本文中,我们首先定义了这四个概念,然后介绍了一种验证正式规范的技术,该技术将故障树分析与静态分析和测试技术相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Verifying formal specifications using fault tree analysis
Specification before implementation has been suggested as a sensible approach to software evolution. The quality of this approach may be improved by using formal specification. However, to serve as a trustable foundation for implementation and to help reduce the cost of program testing, the formal specification must be ensured to be satisfiable, consistent, complete and accurate in recording the user requirements. In this paper, we first define these four concepts and then introduce a technique for verifying formal specifications that combines fault-tree analysis with static analysis and testing techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信