规范关系的规范:三位一体教义的神学和宗教间探索

David Muthukumar Sivasubramanian
{"title":"规范关系的规范:三位一体教义的神学和宗教间探索","authors":"David Muthukumar Sivasubramanian","doi":"10.25278/jj.v18i1.419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Should all metaphysical reflections on the Trinity begin with the “ substance/essence ” ontology? However, this approach has more often led to regressive metaphysical speculations, as is often witnessed in the historical theology of the Church. Are there alternative models that we can glean from the history of the Church that can provide a new means of conceptualizing the doctrine of the Trinity? This essay considers this issue at length to suggest a “ relational ontology ” paradigm in constructing the Trinitarian doctrine. It also makes use of Vishishtadvaita (Qualified Non-Dualism in Hindu philosophy) conception of “body -soul ” analogy to render a “ qualitative panentheistic ” model in construing the doctrine of the Trinity. These theological and interreligious explorations are expected to shed more light on the issue.","PeriodicalId":186227,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Jaffray","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Norming the Norm of Relationality: A Theological and Interreligious Exploration of the Trinitarian Doctrine\",\"authors\":\"David Muthukumar Sivasubramanian\",\"doi\":\"10.25278/jj.v18i1.419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Should all metaphysical reflections on the Trinity begin with the “ substance/essence ” ontology? However, this approach has more often led to regressive metaphysical speculations, as is often witnessed in the historical theology of the Church. Are there alternative models that we can glean from the history of the Church that can provide a new means of conceptualizing the doctrine of the Trinity? This essay considers this issue at length to suggest a “ relational ontology ” paradigm in constructing the Trinitarian doctrine. It also makes use of Vishishtadvaita (Qualified Non-Dualism in Hindu philosophy) conception of “body -soul ” analogy to render a “ qualitative panentheistic ” model in construing the doctrine of the Trinity. These theological and interreligious explorations are expected to shed more light on the issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Jaffray\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Jaffray\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25278/jj.v18i1.419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Jaffray","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25278/jj.v18i1.419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所有关于三位一体的形而上学反思都应该从“物质/本质”本体论开始吗?然而,这种方法更经常导致倒退的形而上学的推测,正如在教会的历史神学中经常看到的那样。我们是否可以从教会的历史中收集到其他的模式,可以提供一种新的方式来概念化三位一体的教义?本文详细讨论了这个问题,并提出了一种构建三位一体教义的“关系本体论”范式。它还利用Vishishtadvaita(印度教哲学中有资格的非二元论)的“身体-灵魂”类比概念,在解释三位一体教义时提供了一个“定性的泛神论”模型。这些神学和宗教间的探索有望对这个问题提供更多的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Norming the Norm of Relationality: A Theological and Interreligious Exploration of the Trinitarian Doctrine
Should all metaphysical reflections on the Trinity begin with the “ substance/essence ” ontology? However, this approach has more often led to regressive metaphysical speculations, as is often witnessed in the historical theology of the Church. Are there alternative models that we can glean from the history of the Church that can provide a new means of conceptualizing the doctrine of the Trinity? This essay considers this issue at length to suggest a “ relational ontology ” paradigm in constructing the Trinitarian doctrine. It also makes use of Vishishtadvaita (Qualified Non-Dualism in Hindu philosophy) conception of “body -soul ” analogy to render a “ qualitative panentheistic ” model in construing the doctrine of the Trinity. These theological and interreligious explorations are expected to shed more light on the issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信